Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

'Major discovery' from MIT primed to unleash solar revolution

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 'Major discovery' from MIT primed to unleash solar revolution

    'Major discovery' from MIT primed to unleash solar revolution
    Scientists mimic essence of plants' energy storage system

    Anne Trafton, News Office
    July 31, 2008

    In a revolutionary leap that could transform solar power from a marginal, boutique alternative into a mainstream energy source, MIT researchers have overcome a major barrier to large-scale solar power: storing energy for use when the sun doesn't shine.

    Until now, solar power has been a daytime-only energy source, because storing extra solar energy for later use is prohibitively expensive and grossly inefficient. With today's announcement, MIT researchers have hit upon a simple, inexpensive, highly efficient process for storing solar energy.

    Requiring nothing but abundant, non-toxic natural materials, this discovery could unlock the most potent, carbon-free energy source of all: the sun. "This is the nirvana of what we've been talking about for years," said MIT's Daniel Nocera, the Henry Dreyfus Professor of Energy at MIT and senior author of a paper describing the work in the July 31 issue of Science. "Solar power has always been a limited, far-off solution. Now we can seriously think about solar power as unlimited and soon."

    Inspired by the photosynthesis performed by plants, Nocera and Matthew Kanan, a postdoctoral fellow in Nocera's lab, have developed an unprecedented process that will allow the sun's energy to be used to split water into hydrogen and oxygen gases. Later, the oxygen and hydrogen may be recombined inside a fuel cell, creating carbon-free electricity to power your house or your electric car, day or night.

    The key component in Nocera and Kanan's new process is a new catalyst that produces oxygen gas from water; another catalyst produces valuable hydrogen gas. The new catalyst consists of cobalt metal, phosphate and an electrode, placed in water. When electricity -- whether from a photovoltaic cell, a wind turbine or any other source -- runs through the electrode, the cobalt and phosphate form a thin film on the electrode, and oxygen gas is produced.

    Combined with another catalyst, such as platinum, that can produce hydrogen gas from water, the system can duplicate the water splitting reaction that occurs during photosynthesis.

    The new catalyst works at room temperature, in neutral pH water, and it's easy to set up, Nocera said. "That's why I know this is going to work. It's so easy to implement," he said.
    'Giant leap' for clean energy

    Sunlight has the greatest potential of any power source to solve the world's energy problems, said Nocera. In one hour, enough sunlight strikes the Earth to provide the entire planet's energy needs for one year.

    James Barber, a leader in the study of photosynthesis who was not involved in this research, called the discovery by Nocera and Kanan a "giant leap" toward generating clean, carbon-free energy on a massive scale.

    "This is a major discovery with enormous implications for the future prosperity of humankind," said Barber, the Ernst Chain Professor of Biochemistry at Imperial College London. "The importance of their discovery cannot be overstated since it opens up the door for developing new technologies for energy production thus reducing our dependence for fossil fuels and addressing the global climate change problem."
    'Just the beginning'

    Currently available electrolyzers, which split water with electricity and are often used industrially, are not suited for artificial photosynthesis because they are very expensive and require a highly basic (non-benign) environment that has little to do with the conditions under which photosynthesis operates.

    More engineering work needs to be done to integrate the new scientific discovery into existing photovoltaic systems, but Nocera said he is confident that such systems will become a reality.

    "This is just the beginning," said Nocera, principal investigator for the Solar Revolution Project funded by the Chesonis Family Foundation and co-Director of the Eni-MIT Solar Frontiers Center. "The scientific community is really going to run with this."

    Nocera hopes that within 10 years, homeowners will be able to power their homes in daylight through photovoltaic cells, while using excess solar energy to produce hydrogen and oxygen to power their own household fuel cell. Electricity-by-wire from a central source could be a thing of the past.

    The project is part of the MIT Energy Initiative, a program designed to help transform the global energy system to meet the needs of the future and to help build a bridge to that future by improving today's energy systems. MITEI Director Ernest Moniz, Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Physics and Engineering Systems, noted that "this discovery in the Nocera lab demonstrates that moving up the transformation of our energy supply system to one based on renewables will depend heavily on frontier basic science."

    The success of the Nocera lab shows the impact of a mixture of funding sources - governments, philanthropy, and industry. This project was funded by the National Science Foundation and by the Chesonis Family Foundation, which gave MIT $10 million this spring to launch the Solar Revolution Project, with a goal to make the large scale deployment of solar energy within 10 years.
    Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

  • #2
    Nice catalyst, seems like the sun bit is a stretch... though one worth reaching for.
    Monkey!!!

    Comment


    • #3
      Big yawn. Another day and another claim that the solar revolution is just around the corner. They've been making the same wild claims for 30 years and the reality is solar is still the single most expensive and impractical power source out there. It's not just a little more expensive but instead is around 500% per kilowatt hour more expensive and even worse it has the equipment utilization rate imaginable. The equipment only produces at around 15% of capacity on average vs 95% for nuclear or fossil fuels.

      This will help marginally in that maybe solar will now be 475% more expensive instead of 500% but a revolution it isn't.
      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

      Comment


      • #4
        I heard a report on NPR yesterday afternoon about this. I hope there is something to it.

        -Arrian
        grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

        The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Oerdin
          Big yawn. Another day and another claim that the solar revolution is just around the corner. They've been making the same wild claims for 30 years and the reality is solar is still the single most expensive and impractical power source out there. .
          Yeah, but last I heard, we are not going to run out of sunlight, and photon mining is free.

          The POTUS candidates are gonna jump all over this.
          Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
          RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Oerdin
            Big yawn. Another day and another claim that the solar revolution is just around the corner. They've been making the same wild claims for 30 years and the reality is solar is still the single most expensive and impractical power source out there. It's not just a little more expensive but instead is around 500% per kilowatt hour more expensive and even worse it has the equipment utilization rate imaginable. The equipment only produces at around 15% of capacity on average vs 95% for nuclear or fossil fuels.

            This will help marginally in that maybe solar will now be 475% more expensive instead of 500% but a revolution it isn't.
            Actually solar power is available RIGHT NOW and at less cost than coal. Problem is the company that manufactures it is a year behind in sales, due to huge demand.
            I'm consitently stupid- Japher
            I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned

            Comment


            • #7
              Let's look at a comparison of electricity costs per source.

              Here's a good starting point: http://www.des.state.nh.us/Coastal/d...omparisons.pdf

              Now I do object to this site's loading of extrenality costs (decommissioning costs ect...) on sources the authors don't like while ignoring them for others (solar cells contain a lot of heavy metals which cause problems, both in production and end of life, which the author conveniently ignores. Still the author is at least honest enough to break down costs by section and so this is a good spot to get broad information.

              We should really be comparing direct costs as the indirect costs are highly subjective and open for debate. Not to mention many of those indirect costs can be easily midigated using, for example, scrubbers on coal fired plants.

              Coal
              capital cost 0.72 cent per kilowatt hour
              95 % capacity factor
              operating and maintenance 1 cent per kilowatt hour
              coal costs 2.14 cents per kilowatt hour
              direct costs: 3.14 cents per kilowatt hour
              (indirect social costs)
              health costs 5.36 cents
              climate 1.07 cents
              total = 10.29 cents per kilowatt hour
              from 'Electric Vision' by Robert Preston Sept 7, 2005
              Djarum4D ialah situs bandar agen resmi togel online terbaik terbesar terpercaya yang menyediakan pasaran togel terbaik seperti pasaran Sydney, Singapura, Hongkong dan masih banyak pasaran togel lainnya dengan diskon terbesar serta permainan Live Games yang menarik dengan kualitas streaming terbaik. Daftar dan main togel online di situs Djarum4d


              Nuclear
              capital cost 0.9 cent per kilowatt hour
              95 % capacity factor
              operating and maintenance 1.4 cents per kilowatt hour
              uraneum costs 0.76 cent per kilowatt hour
              direct costs: 2.16 cents per kilowatt hour
              (indirect social costs)
              waste disposal 0.1 cent
              decommissioning 0.15 cent
              [other environmental costs not quantified]
              total = 3.31 cents per kilowatt hour
              from 'Electric Vision' by Robert Preston Sept 7, 2005
              Djarum4D ialah situs bandar agen resmi togel online terbaik terbesar terpercaya yang menyediakan pasaran togel terbaik seperti pasaran Sydney, Singapura, Hongkong dan masih banyak pasaran togel lainnya dengan diskon terbesar serta permainan Live Games yang menarik dengan kualitas streaming terbaik. Daftar dan main togel online di situs Djarum4d


              Natural Gas
              capital cost 0.42 cent per kilowatt hour
              95 % capacity factor
              operating and maintenance <0.5 cent per kilowatt hour
              gas costs 4.90 cents per kilowatt hour
              direct costs: 4.95 cents per kilowatt hour
              (indirect social costs)
              health costs 2 cents
              climate 0.27 cent
              total = 8.09 cents per kilowatt hour
              from 'Electric Vision' by Robert Preston Sept 7, 2005
              Djarum4D ialah situs bandar agen resmi togel online terbaik terbesar terpercaya yang menyediakan pasaran togel terbaik seperti pasaran Sydney, Singapura, Hongkong dan masih banyak pasaran togel lainnya dengan diskon terbesar serta permainan Live Games yang menarik dengan kualitas streaming terbaik. Daftar dan main togel online di situs Djarum4d


              Solar
              capital cost 17.12 cents per kilowatt hour
              15 - 20 % capacity factor
              operating and maintenance 1 cent per kilowatt hour
              photons cost nothing
              direct costs: 18.12 cents per kilowatt hour
              (indirect social costs)
              aesthetic not quantified
              total = 18.12 cents per kilowatt hour
              from 'Electric Vision' by Robert Preston Sept 7, 2005
              Djarum4D ialah situs bandar agen resmi togel online terbaik terbesar terpercaya yang menyediakan pasaran togel terbaik seperti pasaran Sydney, Singapura, Hongkong dan masih banyak pasaran togel lainnya dengan diskon terbesar serta permainan Live Games yang menarik dengan kualitas streaming terbaik. Daftar dan main togel online di situs Djarum4d


              Wind Power
              capital cost 2.45 cents per kilowatt hour
              25 - 35 % capacity factor
              operating and maintenance 1 cent per kilowatt hour
              wind costs nothing
              direct costs: 3.14 cents per kilowatt hour
              (indirect social costs)
              aesthetic & bird kill not quantified
              total = 3.45 cents per kilowatt hour
              from 'Electric Vision' by Robert Preston Sept 7, 2005
              Djarum4D ialah situs bandar agen resmi togel online terbaik terbesar terpercaya yang menyediakan pasaran togel terbaik seperti pasaran Sydney, Singapura, Hongkong dan masih banyak pasaran togel lainnya dengan diskon terbesar serta permainan Live Games yang menarik dengan kualitas streaming terbaik. Daftar dan main togel online di situs Djarum4d

              “Real” total New England costs 6 - 7 cents per kilowatt hour

              American Wind Energy Association

              Free-Flow Tidal Current
              (Underwater Wind Farm)
              capital cost 5 to 8? cents per kilowatt hour
              30 - 50 % capacity factor
              operating and maintenance 2? cents per kilowatt hour
              Tidal energy costs nothing
              direct costs: 7 - 10 cents per kilowatt hour
              (indirect social costs) not quantified
              total = 7 - 10 cents per kilowatt hour
              from industry estimates in remainder of presentation
              • Some can produce renewable power for less than the
              8.5 cents/kwh wholesale power market
              • Avoids some wholesale power purchases
              • Avoids fossil fuel emissions costs
              • May garner Production Tax Credits
              • Enables sale of Renewable Energy Credits

              Submerged Tidal Array
              capital cost 5 to 7? cents per kilowatt hour
              40 - 60 %? capacity factor
              operating and maintenance 1.5? cents per kilowatt hour
              Tidal energy costs nothing
              direct costs: 6.5 - 8.5? cents per kilowatt hour
              (indirect social costs) not quantified
              total = 6.5 - 8.5? cents per kilowatt hour
              from industry estimates in remainder of presentation
              • Appears competitive with 7.24 cents/kwh PSNH generation
              cost and less than 8.5 cents/kwh wholesale power market
              • Avoids some wholesale power purchases
              • Avoids fossil fuel emissions costs
              • May garner Production Tax Credits
              • Enables sale of Renewable Energy Credits
              Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

              Comment


              • #8
                Just play SimCity and you'll know.
                Monkey!!!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Cost has always been one of solar’s biggest problems. Traditional solar cells require silicon, and silicon is an expensive commodity (exacerbated currently by a global silicon shortage). What’s more, says Peter Harrop, chairman of electronics consulting firm IDTechEx, “it has to be put on glass, so it’s heavy, dangerous, expensive to ship and expensive to install because it has to be mounted.” And up to 70 percent of the silicon gets wasted in the manufacturing process. That means even the cheapest solar panels cost about $3 per watt of energy they go on to produce. To compete with coal, that figure has to shrink to just $1 per watt.

                  Nanosolar’s cells use no silicon, and the company’s manufacturing process allows it to create cells that are as efficient as most commercial cells for as little as 30 cents a watt.
                  “You’re talking about printing rolls of the stuff—printing it on the roofs of 18-wheeler trailers, printing it on garages, printing it wherever you want it,” says Dan Kammen, founding director of the Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory at the University of California at Berkeley. “It really is quite a big deal in terms of altering the way we think about solar and in inherently altering the economics of solar.”
                  The owner of this domain has not yet uploaded their website.
                  I'm consitently stupid- Japher
                  I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The only question for me regarding solar panels on my roof is "when?" I'm holding off for now, because I've been reading that the prices are due to drop significantly over the next couple of years.

                    -Arrian
                    grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                    The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Theban, nice
                      Monkey!!!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Oh yes, someone in the Spanish forums registered as 'Theban', so you guys will finally have to spell it right if I'm to know who you are talking to.
                        I'm consitently stupid- Japher
                        I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ban him! Probably one your DLs anyway. I'll just follow him around and report all his posts as spam.

                          Tehban still works though.
                          Monkey!!!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            The stuff that Oerdin quotes shows that solar power is 1.76x the price of coal-generated power, not 5x as he claimed originally.

                            The system that is described in this paper is more complicated than a normal solar system, however. Panels + inverter + electolyzer + fuel cell + storage volume for hydrogren. Seems more complicated than lead-acid batteries.
                            Last edited by DanS; August 1, 2008, 12:57.
                            I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Just wait. He'll DanS you.
                              Monkey!!!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X