Tweet
He beat you too I see. 
-
I'm consitently stupid- Japher
I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned -
Human rights don't need to be supported by a majority. They exist to protect minorities.Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
If the people of California supported it, I'm sure they wouldn't mind holding a referendum.Comment
-
So I have the right now to demand someone marries me?Human rights don't need to be supported by a majority. They exist to protect minorities.
I didn't know that marriage was an individual right.Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!Comment
-
Yes, I think you should be allowed to marry your horse if it makes you feel better.Comment
-
I don't understand the logic how you came from my post to your sentenceOriginally posted by Ben Kenobi
So I have the right now to demand someone marries me?
Comment
-
The California supreme court's 120 page opinion trumps your 2 sentence stupidity.Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
So I have the right now to demand someone marries me?
I didn't know that marriage was an individual right.
You lose."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "Comment
-
People had the right to be treated equally under the law unless, at the California Supreme Court says, there is a compelling state interest to the contrary.Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
So I have the right now to demand someone marries me?
I didn't know that marriage was an individual right.Comment
-
Is God's Will not a compelling enough reason?Originally posted by Zkribbler
People had the right to be treated equally under the law unless, at the California Supreme Court says, there is a compelling state interest to the contrary.
"Comment
-
Maybe for a theocracy."The French caused the war [Persian Gulf war, 1991]" - Ned
"you people who bash Bush have no appreciation for one of the great presidents in our history." - Ned
"I wish I had gay sex in the boy scouts" - DissidentComment
-
Good day for CA.
Comment
-
That's the problem, now, isn't it? God's Will isn't subject to any Equal Rights provision. But governmental action is.Originally posted by Badfuzzy
Is God's Will not a compelling enough reason?
Comment
-
How does equal protection apply to a collective? It's always been individuals. This is why marriage has never fallen under that category.People had the right to be treated equally under the law unless, at the California Supreme Court says, there is a compelling state interest to the contrary.
I don't have the right to demand marriage benefits from the state on an individual basis, or to demand any benefits and recognition for my relationships. The state can choose to recognise them, but that is their decision. It's not an individual right, because it requires the consent of another party.
Judicial tyranny is hardly substitute for the will of the people. I don't see why it would be so difficult to secure the support of the people of California for this issue, rather then overriding what they have already said.Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!Comment
-
The US had better be careful then.Originally posted by Kontiki
Maybe for a theocracy.You just wasted six ... no, seven ... seconds of your life reading this sentence.Comment
-
I used the incorrect sarcasm smiley
"Comment
-
Comment