Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Religious persecution in Great Britain

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    I'm sure it's a vast improvement for him
    Blah

    Comment


    • #77
      BeBro was made an honorary Anglo many years ago when it was made clear that he not only understood irony but used it. Before that he was only given honorary American status because he understood sarcasm when given proper prompting tags like "[/sarcasm]". He's come along way from the days of "eins, zwei, drei I tell you funny joke, ja?"
      One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by Oerdin
        Jesus specifically stated that his teachings were here to replace the old rabbinical laws; the old testament was included in the Bible mainly as background information. This is why Christians aren't bound by such old testament instructions as being forbidden to eat pork.
        This is misleading. Jesus never said nor thought that Christians shouldn't obey political laws.

        To compare the Koran specifically states that all Muslims who convert to other religions must be given a chance to convert back but if they refuse they must be killed. Huge difference.
        Islam is specific as its Holy Book also contains political laws. You may sure claim that there are no such laws in the New Testament, but since religion will always be organized into 'earthly' matters anyway, you can't dissociate Christianism from its Churches.
        In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

        Comment


        • #79
          I said rabbinical laws not political laws. Christians are taught that most of the orders of the old testament like the food laws or the orders to stone to death people who don't observe the sabbath are not to be upheld though some basic ones (such as the ten commandments) are to be upheld. Exactly what is and isn't to be upheld has been a source of constant argument between Christian groups for the last 2000 years.

          None of this has anything to do with political laws/laws of Caesar.
          Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Dauphin
            BeBro was made an honorary Anglo many years ago when it was made clear that he not only understood irony but used it. Before that he was only given honorary American status because he understood sarcasm when given proper prompting tags like "[/sarcasm]". He's come along way from the days of "eins, zwei, drei I tell you funny joke, ja?"
            I wonder which achievement signals honorary Australian status?
            Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
            The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
            The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

            Comment


            • #81
              The ability to drink large quantities of crap beer? The ability to use the word "mate" more then 4 times per sentence?
              Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

              Comment


              • #82
                That still doesn't really distinguish from the English to be honest mate.
                One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                Comment


                • #83
                  Being good at sports is the divider that you need.
                  One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Right, English suck at sports.
                    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by Thue


                        TIme for some bible quoting. Deuteronomy chapter 13, verse 6-10 (http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/www/B...uteronomy.html)
                        Oh no, yet again someone threadjacking a thread to be about Judaism!!!!

                        So, do I go into detail about the evolution and meaning of Jewish law, wrt idol worshippers, gays, etc? Or do I leave it be, and let secularists talk about how eevil the "old" testament is, while Christians talk about how "old" and inapplicable the "old" testament is?

                        Feh!

                        Happy holidays, y'all!!! It was movies and Chinese food for us.
                        "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by Oerdin
                          I said rabbinical laws not political laws. Christians are taught that most of the orders of the old testament like the food laws or the orders to stone to death people who don't observe the sabbath are not to be upheld though some basic ones (such as the ten commandments) are to be upheld. Exactly what is and isn't to be upheld has been a source of constant argument between Christian groups for the last 2000 years.

                          None of this has anything to do with political laws/laws of Caesar.
                          The rabbis had already effectively revised the laws that you call "rabbinic" laws. A discussion of the death penalty from shortly after that period, mainly turns on the relationship between the frequency of its application, and the amount of murders committed. Its pretty clear it was rarely if ever applied against anyone other than murderers.
                          "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            So then even Judaism is ahead of the curve on the whole not murdering people for living their own life thing?

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by Whoha
                              So then even Judaism is ahead of the curve on the whole not murdering people for living their own life thing?
                              "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by lord of the mark
                                So, do I go into detail about the evolution and meaning of Jewish law, wrt idol worshippers, gays, etc?
                                Yes please.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X