Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Russia to temporarily withdraw from Treaty on Conventional Forces in Europe

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Colonâ„¢
    I told you before it's a necessity to make them feel important.
    Why is it a necessity to provide a sop toward Russian vanity and nationalism? Just because they're a bunch of manic-depressive slavs?

    Seriously, it seems like some Euros think that if they aren't sucking Russki pecker, they're somehow offending proper Russki sensibilities.
    I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by DanS


      Why is it a necessity to provide a sop toward Russian vanity and nationalism? Just because they're a bunch of manic-depressive slavs?

      Seriously, it seems like some Euros think that if they aren't sucking Russki pecker, they're somehow offending proper Russki sensibilities.
      I'm not saying Russia's ego should be stroked, I'm just saying that discussing the ABM's potential is beside the point.
      DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Saras
        this is for domestic consumption
        Yep, the deployment of new missile systems doesn't violate the treaty as long as the US still has room left in its quota. Given how deep the cuts in US Forces in Europe has been since 1990 I'd imagine there is still plenty of quota left. Since there isn't a valid treaty violation then why is Putin doing this? Simple, he has to be seen as doing something even if it is completely meaningless.
        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

        Comment


        • #49
          All rhetorics. Russia has no place dictating to NATO how NATO is to secure itself against outside threats. The sooner Russia realises as much the better, which is why there should be no inter-partial talks on such subjects.

          Where NATO's security is concerned, Russia is precisely entitled to.. STFU.

          Comment


          • #50
            Is recognizing the destabilizing effect of a political move now tantamount to sucking pecker?

            Comment


            • #51
              It's destabilising because of the manner in which they choose to react. You could build a giant catapult in Warsaw and they'd still kick up a fuss.
              DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.

              Comment


              • #52
                I'm actually labelling their reaction as destabilizing, as you do, but also try to point to the reasons behind it.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Here's a nice article that explains how the missile shield could present a potential threat to Russia in face of losing MAD, due to a possible US nuclear supremacy and thus a Russian loss of a strong second strike capacity.

                  For four decades, relations among the major nuclear powers have been shaped by their common vulnerability, a condition known as mutual assured destruction. But with the U.S. arsenal growing rapidly while Russia's decays and China's stays small, the era of MAD is ending -- and the era of U.S. nuclear primacy has begun.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Sir Ralph
                    Yes, I think it will be as hard for them as it was 39/40.
                    By the time Soviets entered, most important polish territories were already in german hand. Polish forces were ordered NOT to fight the Soviets.
                    Baltic States weren't fighting either.
                    "I realise I hold the key to freedom,
                    I cannot let my life be ruled by threads" The Web Frogs
                    Middle East!

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by aneeshm


                      A seriously demilitarized Europe would be a disaster in the long run. Does nobody remember the lessons of the last European world war?
                      Must European countries are barely breaking 2% of their GDPs on defense. The European militaries are, for the most part, a joke compared to what they once were.
                      Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Only people who are studying IR are taking this seriously, for the more people discuss about this the more IR majors will get employed as experts on the subject.

                        All rhetorics. Russia has no place dictating to NATO how NATO is to secure itself against outside threats. The sooner Russia realises as much the better [...]

                        Where NATO's security is concerned, Russia is precisely entitled to.. STFU.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          2% is plenty.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Sandman
                            2% is plenty.
                            I completely agree. They are safe from invasion what more do they need?

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Geronimo
                              I completely agree. They are safe from invasion what more do they need?
                              Them to STFU about how the US runs things then.
                              I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                              For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Yay. Russia's getting a bit too sensitive these days. But while this is serious, a news bit I read in a Norwegian paper today is just silly: A retired woman who was on a tourist trip to the place Norway's, Finland's and Russia's borders meet(popular tourist attraction for some reason) went 1 meter too far when she took a picture, violating Russia's border. She was photographed by the Russians, which promptly sent a message to the Norwegian officials requesting them to punish her on the basis of an old treaty from the Cold War. And here in Norway officials are careful not to hurt Russian feelings, so when she came back to the bus, she was arrested and later fined.
                                Do not fear, for I am with you; Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God.-Isaiah 41:10
                                I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made - Psalms 139.14a
                                Also active on WePlayCiv.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X