The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
JS Mill, free speech, and creationism/global warming
Originally posted by Arrian
Debate on the subject is not completely closed off. Therefore, we (or rather the "evolution side") are assuming we are most likely correct.
We've closed off the important forums of debate, the schools and the scientific community.
There's not much of one, actually. Most people won't use or even remember anything they learn beyond grade 8 math/science and maybe grade 10 english.
Time better spent on the video simulator errr.... video game.
"Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter
Why? If you close off all debate on a subject, you are assuming that you are absolutely correct (that you are infallible). This is obviously false.
No, you close off debate because there's only a finite amount of time in which to educate children, and the academic consensus is probably close to accurate. You're assuming that this is equivalent to infallibility.
"Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
-Bokonon
University biology departments are concerned with two things, as far as I can tell: preparing people to be doctors and preparing them to be biologists. In either case it's absolutely necessary to teach them the state of the art.
Uhhh...what I mean is, if 75% of people believe that God created the Earth in 6 days and that evolution never happened, then how long will it be until they start basing funding decisions on orthodoxy? Right now we've got common conception fairly in line with scientific consensus on a lot of basic issues by teaching only the consensus in schools to people who have neither the capacity nor the inclination to judge properly for themseles. What happens if that ceases to be the case?
We've closed off the important forums of debate, the schools and the scientific community.
The schools aren't a forum of debate, and the scientific community isn't closed.
Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?
It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok
The scientific community can't be bothered to waste its time with nutbars. We have more important things to worry about.
Though if one is so worried about the consequences of ID gaining ground, devoting some time & energy to ripping ID to shreds as publicly as possible might be worthwhile...
So it boils down to: we are correct, people can't be convinced by logical debate, so we must indoctrinate them with our beliefs so they'll support us in the future.
Just like the newspapers aren't properly a forum for debate. But at least they aren't being paid for by my taxes, and they don't have a captive audience of children, who are even stupider than the general public.
Comment