Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Actually, the original demand by the Brits was that the IRA disarm and disband, and then the Brits would agree to negotiate. Why is it that other states always demand the complete surrender of the other side before they begin to negotiate to do what they should have done before violence broke out? And who believes they're actually gonna do it. If there were no violence in Gaza, Israel would claimthat the negros were perfectly happy being slaves that the Palestinians weer perfectly happy with occupation.
When Serbia does it, its genocide. When Israel does it, it's legitimate self defense.
Originally posted by Oerdin
It's become a matter of principle like when the UK refused to speak to the IRA until they renounced violence.
It's become a matter of principle like when the UK refused to speak to the IRA until they renounced violence.
Actually, the original demand by the Brits was that the IRA disarm and disband, and then the Brits would agree to negotiate. Why is it that other states always demand the complete surrender of the other side before they begin to negotiate to do what they should have done before violence broke out? And who believes they're actually gonna do it. If there were no violence in Gaza, Israel would claim
When Serbia does it, its genocide. When Israel does it, it's legitimate self defense.
Kosovo is probably going to get its independence. Let me say here and now, that IF Kosovo, or a group openly tolerated by the govt of Kosovo, calls for the destruction of Serbia, stockpiles thousands of rockets along the Serbian border, and then enters Serbia to kidnap Serbian soldier, and Serbia responds with a campaign as restrained as Israels is, I will be the first to support Serbia's legitimate right of self-defense.
Comment