The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Frankly I would even say that the US has somewhat more natural resources than canada if you look beyond mineral resources and timber as natural resources.
I'm interested in this and I'm sure that if you look beyond minerals , timber, fresh water, petroleum, hydroelectic potential and precious stones. the US has Canada beat !!!
Seriously though -- I know the US would have a lot more arable land and capacity for warm weather crops and withiout looking it up, I assume they would skunk Canada in agriculture. Also if people are a natural resources, the US has 10 times as many.
But otherwise do you really think that the US has more NATURAL resources than Canada?
You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo
China, India and Brazil all have GDPs higher than Canada.
Plus Spain and Russia (in the GDP PPP index) according to the world bank.
GNI 2005
1 United States 12,969,561
2 Japan 4,988,209
3 Germany 2,852,337
4 China 2,263,825
5 United Kingdom 2,263,731
6 France 2,177,670 a
7 Italy 1,724,894
8 Spain 1,100,134
9 Canada 1,051,873
10 India 793,017
11 Korea, Rep. 764,684
12 Mexico 753,394
13 Australia 654,645
14 Brazil 644,133
15 Russian Federation 639,080
1 United States 12,409,465
2 China 8,572,666 a
3 Japan 3,943,754
4 India 3,815,553 b
5 Germany 2,417,537
6 United Kingdom 1,926,809
7 France 1,829,559
8 Italy 1,667,753
9 Brazil 1,627,262
10 Russian Federation 1,559,934
11 Spain 1,133,539
12 Canada 1,061,236
13 Korea, Rep. 1,056,094
14 Mexico 1,052,443
In 1975, the whole purpose was to make an informal club of rich nations in order to discuss common problems, such as those created by another club, the OPEC. The only error they made was to advertise this idea, and now people desagree with the name, the members, the agenda ...
QFT - it was the economically leading members of NATO, plus Japan (which was closely allied to the others, even if not a member of NATO)
Russia was invited to prop up Yeltsin and Russian democracy in the '90s. Thats obviously obsolete now, but its too hard to disinvite Russia.
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
Originally posted by Oerdin
Russia doesn't really belong in this group. It was let in in the 90's with the belief that it would encourage Russia to strengthen democracy. The opposite has happened. Economically Russia doesn't belong since its economy is smaller then Denmark's so it is down to natural resources. Namely, oil and gas.
I think the Russian people would be the best judges of the state of democracy in their country. Most seem to be quite happy with Putin and his programme.
They seem to prefer strong, central leadership. So long as they have elections for that leader things are going fine. Beyond that, Russia will liberalise when Russians are ready for it.
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
China, India and Brazil all have GDPs higher than Canada with Brazil and India being democracies. Thus G8 seems more like a WASP club with Japan being the token ****** (I apologise to anyone offended by my use of this term).
You forget that members are also supposed to have advanced economies. Thus huge economies made up mostly of peasant farmers doesn't qualify.
Comment