Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
Pedro's run was amazing, but given the overpitching, primitive medical diagnostics and training, I think it's highly likely Koufax would have fared much better and lasted a lot longer if he'd had access to modern training and sports medicine. Not to mention the "work 'em into the ground" approach with pitchers in those days.
Pedro's run was amazing, but given the overpitching, primitive medical diagnostics and training, I think it's highly likely Koufax would have fared much better and lasted a lot longer if he'd had access to modern training and sports medicine. Not to mention the "work 'em into the ground" approach with pitchers in those days.
Though it is interesting to note that using the measure of ERA+, which adjusts of park and era effects, Pedro Martinez has 5 (FIVE!) seasons better than Koufax's top ERA+ season. Though it is more than impressive enough that Pedro Martinez has 5 seasons in the Top 40 pitching seasons of all time (including the best season in the modern era [post 1900] of baseball).
While Koufax may have lasted longer with modern medicine, one wonders if he could have reached the heights of Martinez.
Though what is clear is that I think Pedro Martinez has been very undervalued by our generation. Yes, I said UNDERvalued. We talk about Maddux and Clemens being among the best ever. Pedro deserves to be in that discussion as well. I think Martinez, if he retired today, is in the Top 15 pitchers of all time. He'll only rise as he continues to pitch and continues to put up ERA+ numbers aroud the 150s like he did last season for the Mets [I'm not sure what his ERA+ number is this season].
Comment