End of Moussaoui trial may destroy Bush administration

[Ted Striker]

Originally posted by Jaguar

Raymond Munro (FM)

Professor of Theatre, Clark University

Zounds! The Professor of Theatre at Clark University is on his side! No way we can win now!

Maybe he can detect good acting.


Nice pick out of a list of 10 though

[Ted Striker]

Originally posted by Jaguar
I'm not sure of that, but I could easily find you one professor who believes in him and one who doesn't. What's your point?

You just made it.

[Jaguar]

No, that was Kuci's point.

[Ted Striker]

So how do you decide who is right and who is wrong?

These people seem to have just as much credential, if not more so, than (Military Hardware jackoff of the month magazine) Popular Mechanics

[Kuciwalker]

There are 4 people on that list who might potentially have SOME qualifications in questioning the crash:

Andreas von Buelow (FM)

Former assistant German defense minister, director of the German Secret Service, minister for research and technology, and member of Parliament for 25 years

A German Rummy. What are the odds that he knows **** about structural engineering?

George Nelson (FM)

Colonel, USAF (retired)

ZOMFG he was in the Air Force, which has planes, which means he must know about this stuff! Except last I checked, the Air Force really frowned upon flying planes into buildings...

Robert M. Bowman (FM)

Former Director of the U.S. "Star Wars" Space Defense Program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, and a former Air Force Lieutenant Colonel with 101 combat missions

OMG HE HAD 101 combat missions!!!!!!!!!!!! Did any of them involve flying planes into buildings? (Given that he's still around, my guess is no.)

Steven Jones (FM)

Professor of Physics, Brigham Young University, co-chair of S9/11T and the creator of its home page and its forum

One physicist! I can find physicists who think that Einstein is complete bollocks. Plus, there's no reason a physicist would know much of anything about structural engineering, either. And he's from Mormon U.

The rest are random filosofers and linguists and economists...

[Ted Striker]

Go on

I trust the wisdom of a 16 year old highschooler over those guys any day

[Kuciwalker]

With what?

[DaShi]

The structure of the World Trade Center was secretly built out of advanced inflatable technology discovered in the spacecraft that crashed in Roswell. Thus, when the buildings were hit the structure was punctured allowing the air inside to be released and causing the building to collapse in on itself. There's no other explanation.

[Ted Striker]

LOL

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by Ted Striker
Go on

I trust the wisdom of a 16 year old highschooler over those guys any day

If you'd like, I'll find a list ten times that size of engineers who believe that the 9/11 story is true.

Despite that fact that that was one of the more retarded ad hominems I've ever seen on this forum.

[Kuciwalker]

I bet I know more about physics and engineering than that theatre professor, too.

[Ted Striker]

Originally posted by Jaguar
The towers aren't any larger than the Empire State Building, and they had to withstand an aircraft impact ~20 times greater (fuzzy math, but whatever, several orders of magnitude greater) than any skyscraper had faced before.

You're making a really bad relative comparison


The point here is that technology to withstand plane collisions has been around since before Empire State was built


Each building considering handling airplane collisions of planes larger than their time

How the two compare to each other is irrelevent

[Ted Striker]

Originally posted by Kuciwalker
I bet I know more about physics and engineering than that theatre professor, too.

You are that high on yourself, yes

[Jaguar]

Originally posted by Ted Striker



You're making a really bad relative comparison


The point here is that technology to withstand plane collisions has been around since before Empire State was built


Each building considering handling airplane collisions of planes larger than their time

How the two compare to each other is irrelevent

You brought up the B25. I didn't. If it's an irrelevant comparison, what purpose did bringing it up serve?

[Ted Striker]

Originally posted by Kuciwalker


If you'd like, I'll find a list ten times that size of engineers who believe that the 9/11 story is true.

Despite that fact that that was one of the more retarded ad hominems I've ever seen on this forum.

That's your problem.

You're focusing on this single issue, how the buildings collapsed


On that particular site, there are many unanswered questions regarding on September 11th, what actually happened, besides how the buildings collapsed, the site talks about ALL the unanswered questions, besides the particular cause of the catastrophic failure of 1,2 and 7

There are reasons the Star Wars guy and the German Secret service director are included on it, as many of the questions don't just involve physics, engineering, etc questions