The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Originally posted by Serb
Same was there in 80's, despite Majahedens were supplied and trained by a superpower.
During a decade of Soviet presence in Afghanistan Soviet Army lost there less than 14, 500 of its personel (including non-combat deaths). So, I doubt that:
1) you'll be there after ten years
2) and if you will, your casualty rate will be lower than ours. Because our casualty rate in Afghanistan was four times lower than your casualty rate in Vietnam.
a) How many NATO soldiers do you think have died in 4 years in Afghanistan? Might have reached a hundred, but I doubt it. So we're talking a casualty rate a hundred times lower than yours. Not just that; the insurgents are being marginalised as we speak. They can't base in Afghanistan proper any more. And Pakistan will be far less friendly to them than they were to your enemies in the 80s
The US can't help it if it kicks so much more ass than Russia. Stop trying to make excuses for Russia and just accept that we pwn you in everyway. You were only let into the G-7 out of pitty.
I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Originally posted by Ecthy
In Afgh? No chance, that's our colony now I'm afraid
The rotating leadership is being handed over to us next week. We held it a couple of years ago, now we're up again. We're flying in another 2000 to take care of that responsibility. If Germany is currently in charge they'll probably rotate out a large number of their troops.
a) How many NATO soldiers do you think have died in 4 years in Afghanistan? Might have reached a hundred, but I doubt it. So we're talking a casualty rate a hundred times lower than yours. Not just that; the insurgents are being marginalised as we speak. They can't base in Afghanistan proper any more. And Pakistan will be far less friendly to them than they were to your enemies in the 80s
b) "Our" casualty rate in Vietnam was 0
a) We are taliking about two different wars here. When we were there it was a proxy war between two superpowers. When US came there, they had us and and the most importantly, our ally - the Northern Alliance on their side. And the country was already devastated by previous wars. So, the circumstances are completely different. Had we trained, supplied and armed the Taliban, your achievments would be much lesser and your casualty rate would be much bigger. But, not only we don't do that, but we actually do the opposite - we help you in this war, because it's in our national interests now.
b) Who cares? "Their" casualty rate in Vietnam was about 60,000 - at least four times bigger than our casualty rate in Afghanistan.
Originally posted by DinoDoc
The US can't help it if it kicks so much more ass than Russia. Stop trying to make excuses for Russia and just accept that we pwn you in everyway. You were only let into the G-7 out of pitty.
Comment