Tweet
Tester comes fairly close, from what I've heard. And Burns will have a lot more baggage than he did in 2000.
-
"Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
-Bokonon -
5/31/2005 Mason-Dixon poll has Burns over Tester 50-26. The better bet seems to be John Morrison, but Burns was over him 49-34 percent. Increased name recognition for the Dems and Burns' problems will change things, but for now I still give Burns an advantage.Tutto nel mondo è burlaComment
-
While those numbers look better for Morrison, keep in mind that he has almost twice the name ID of Tester.
Burns' name was second with 45 percent favorable to 24 percent unfavorable, with 30 percent neutral and 1 percent not recognizing him.
Morrison's name received 22 percent favorable recognition to 7 percent unfavorable, with 40 percent neutral. Thirty-one percent of the voters didn't recognize his name.
Tester had a 14 percent favorable recognition and 4 percent unfavorable, with 21 percent neutral. Sixty-one percent of voters didn't recognize his name.
With only 39% name ID, 50/26 isn't all that bad."Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
-BokononComment
Comment