Originally posted by Dracon II
We mostly hear about the suppression of democratic activists in China here in the west... but they seem to be arresting Maoists nowadays too.
(Mind you, the Chinese Government has always had an ambiguous relationship with Mao and has a history of arresting leftist, as well as rightist elements).
But it would be interesting to know just how much the unrest in China is actually about liberal ideals (as we like to flatter ourselves thinking) rather than the tumultuous economic changes that have been occurring there since 1978.
We mostly hear about the suppression of democratic activists in China here in the west... but they seem to be arresting Maoists nowadays too.
(Mind you, the Chinese Government has always had an ambiguous relationship with Mao and has a history of arresting leftist, as well as rightist elements).
But it would be interesting to know just how much the unrest in China is actually about liberal ideals (as we like to flatter ourselves thinking) rather than the tumultuous economic changes that have been occurring there since 1978.
There is a very revealing passage in the biography of Mao written by his personal physician in which the Party leaders hold an emergency meeting just after the seizure of the Gang of Four. They are trying to decide if the Gang of Four should be imprisoned because they are rightists, or imprisoned because they are leftists.
Some things haven't changed.

Regarding Mao, I think most educated, urban Chinese are now fairly realistic about him, they do not revere him as a saint, but as a great leader who made some huge mistakes. If I ask a class to each describe a person they dislike, there are usually one or two students who choose Mao.
Comment