Originally posted by ravagon
We're going to need more synonyms!
We're going to need more synonyms!

Remember I've dealt with television producers for more than twenty five years! Compared to them, you're as rugged as a James Simpson-Daniel tackle! 



I'd have liked to have seen him with the sort of service that Gregan was giving the SH midfield. Regardless of the context of the match, he still showed more class than the incumbent England centres combined. And Titterall showed more class than the incumbent England hooker - which is to say, he was mobile, he didn't cough up the ball at every opportunity, and his throws hit the mark more than they missed. Even The Nose, obviously motivated by the dream of a Lions jersey, worked his backside off, into everything at every opportunity. The problem is, the context of the match makes it difficult to draw serious conclusions.





I am sure it is obvious to you that the NH were only outclassed because there were only four Englishmen involved? 




And rightly so. The more I read about Farrell, the more I can't believe the fuss. He's almost 30, he has a bung knee, and no - or next to no - rugby background. It's not dissimilar to the Waratahs' pursuit of Andrew Johns as a fly half last year. Johns is said to be the best L***** player in the world, a year older than Farrell, and also with a dodgy knee. The Waratahs resorted to private sponsorship to buy him but forces within the ARU ultimately kyboshed it. But the fundamental difference was that it was a Waratahs-driven initiative. He was to be a S12 purchase. Anything beyond that - like the Wallabies - was by the by. I didn't care if the Waratahs bought him. But I wouldn't have wanted Eddie buying him for the Wallabies. (In fact, apparently, Eddie advised the ARU against chipping in to help buy Johns. Which p*ssed the Waratahs off mightily)






Comment