4 men rapes 13-year old and get away with it

[Chemical Ollie]

Originally posted by Giancarlo


What a load of crap. The people on the left would think we could reform rapists and murderers.. the people on the right want justice.

The leftists are feminazis. They cry rape even in cases when it's very questionable, and ask for severe punishment.

There was a case 5-7 years ago, when some 16-17 year olds were on holiday on Cyprus. Everybody know those trips are all about sex, booze and rock'n roll without adult supervision.

One night a Swedish girl and a boy was really drunk and passed out in a hotel room where some Norwegian guys stayed. The girls friend walked into the room and found the boy and girl naked on top on each other, and a gang of Norwegians standing by, cheering and taking pictures. She shouted gang rape and ran out and called the police.

The Swedish boy was arrested and it was all over media even before the case was investigated. The leftists asked for the boys head on a plate. Then it turned out that the Norwegians had undressed him while he was passed out and put him on top of the passed out girl to take humiliating pictures of them. The police on Cyprus dismissed the case for the Swedish boy, still leftists in Sweden demanded that he should be prosecuted by a Swedish court when he got home. I don't know what happened to the Norwegian boys, they probably got prosecuted for sexual harrassment or something. As for the girl, she was never physically raped, but probably felt like she was raped mentally, after all the media hype. Once you say "rape" to the feminist media there's no turning back, even if the investigation proves something else.

[Dis]

I feel both extremes have bad side effects.

If you favour the woman too much, you are going to have cases where the man is prosecuted even though he did nothing. If you go the other way, you are going to have cases where a woman is raped, but nothing happens to the man who rapes her.

What do you all think of the Kobe Bryant case in Colorado? That is normally a very pro-woman state, but in this case for some reason. All these leaks about the victim made it public. That case had no chance of succeeding.

[Uncle Sparky]

Some lawyer screwed up. If the age of consent is 13 in Sweden, and I think its probably higher, the girl would, under Canadian law be unable to give an informed consent. Period.

[Chemical Ollie]

Originally posted by Kamrat X
The legislation regarding rape is getting more strict. I don´t exactly know when it´s to be implemented. I think June 1:st or possibly not until 2006. But it will be more strict. And not a day to soon if you ask me.

Technically, you could be charged with rape if you **** your wife while she's asleep, according to the new law. You need her active consent for the sex to be legal, and she can't say yes if she's asleep. But how fun is it so bang someone who's sleeping anyway? And how many wifes would take such a thing to court, if the marriage isn't already doomed for other reasons?

But some hungover one-night-stand who wakes up with the Ugly Coyote will, and there will be a lot of debate in the media when it happens. Some guys may even ask for a written permission before they go home with a drunk girl, just in case.

[Last Conformist]

Originally posted by Uncle Sparky
Some lawyer screwed up. If the age of consent is 13 in Sweden, and I think its probably higher, the girl would, under Canadian law be unable to give an informed consent. Period.

The age of consent is 15 in Sweden, but for some reason having sex with a non-consenting minor isn't necessarily rape under the current law. That's gonna change with the new one, which is basically classifying all non-consensual sex as rape, no matter the age of the victim.

[Monk]

- edit: never mind

[Winston]

Originally posted by Chemical Ollie
Some guys may even ask for a written permission before they go home with a drunk girl, just in case.

And don't forget to ask for a renewed written confirmation of her continued consent every couple of minutes during the act itself. You have to remember that if she decides the next day that she changed her mind after 18 minutes of humping, then changed it back again 30 seconds later, it'd still be rape. Even if she didn't say anything. At least that's how it is here.

Best thing would be to have a lawyer and two witnesses present throughout the lovemaking, the lawyer constantly asking the girl if she still consents, and also properly time-stamping the written confirmations as they roll in.

[Last Conformist]

I just recalled an article about one of the Left's suggestions for the new law, which would have meant that men, legally speaking, could no longer be the victims of rape. Anyone know if that got anywhere?

[Chemical Ollie]

Originally posted by Winston
Best thing would be to have a lawyer and two witnesses present throughout the lovemaking, the lawyer constantly asking the girl if she still consents, and also properly time-stamping the written confirmations as they roll in.

YES YES YES YES YES YES YES

[Zoid]

Originally posted by Chemical Ollie

The leftists are feminazis. They cry rape even in cases when it's very questionable, and ask for severe punishment.

Please, don´t make broad sweeping generalizations. Only stupid pc-leftists act that way. We thinking leftists think first, cry rape second...

Technically, you could be charged with rape if you **** your wife while she's asleep, according to the new law. You need her active consent for the sex to be legal, and she can't say yes if she's asleep. But how fun is it so bang someone who's sleeping anyway? And how many wifes would take such a thing to court, if the marriage isn't already doomed for other reasons?

I see no problems in this. If you want sexual relief that bad you may as well spank your monkey.

Another article about the incident: http://www.gp.se/gp/jsp/Crosslink.jsp?d=119&a=199159

[Last Conformist]

I do not really see a problem with the sleeping wife scenario (would it work the same with a sleeping husband, BTW?). I do see a problem with the one-night-stand scenario.

[Heresson]

If Bush tells you that we hate freedom, ask him why we didn't attack Sweden - Osama Bin Ladin

Because Sweden is insignificant?

[Last Conformist]

He did take the trouble to threaten Norway, so I don't think insignificance bothers him.

[Dinner]

Don't go thinking you are safe just because sweden has different policies. OBL also has said that everyone who doesn't convert to Islam must be killed. Just because he's decided to go after other peole before you doesn't mean you aren't also on the list.

[techumseh]

Originally posted by Oerdin
OBL also has said that everyone who doesn't convert to Islam must be killed.

When?