Blix found a "smoking gun" in Iraq?

[GePap]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
Are you going to make any real arguments, GePap, or are you just going to continue flapping your lips and making smilies? Deal with the thread topic or get out...

Drake, this "topic" is not worth anything more. I need the amusement.

As I have been saying:

On the next episode of Bush and the Chickenhakws..

The evil Saddameo, king of San Badghdadio takes the pretty Bush daughter hostage, and attaches her to the barrel of the evil Osamagun...

Can the Chickenhawks get there in time?

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten

Uh, the US/UK assertion is that these drones can go more than 150km, thus violating the UNSC resolution.

Where'd you get this false idea? You didn't even read the article I posted, did you?

Does this mean anything to you?

Al-Samoud 2

Why would US/UK compare the drone to said missile?

[Drake Tungsten]

Even if I ignore the bias (which is obvious) of the site you quoted,

The Nuclear Control Institute is obviously biased?



As for the sources you want, go to the NCI site and click on the hypertext footnote links. Or read the bottom of the page, where all the sources are laid out. Jesus, it's like teaching a child how to do research...

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
Are you going to make any real arguments, GePap, or are you just going to continue flapping your lips and making smilies? Deal with the thread topic or get out...

Sheesh, talk about thick-skinned. You have been doing what you accused GePap of.

[cinch]

Only grossly misinformed people seriously argue that Saddam doesn't have chemical and biological weapons. Welcome to the club...

Is there free lemonade in the clubhouse?

Okay, I misspoke and overstated... I don't think the spy plane implies that Iraq has mass quantities of chemical weapons which it is willing to use at a whim... would be my more refined statement.

Please point out how it is wrong so that I may correct it again.

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten

Even if I ignore the bias (which is obvious) of the site you quoted,

The Nuclear Control Institute is obviously biased?



As for the sources you want, go to the NCI site and click on the hypertext footnote links. Or read the bottom of the page, where all the sources are laid out. Jesus, it's like teaching a child how to do research...

Speaking of which, have you read the IAEA report? It's pretty clear that you are a hypocrite.

[Drake Tungsten]

Why would US/UK compare the drone to said missile?

They didn't, you fool. The Times put it in the article to show the more serious nature of the drone discovery. It's more obvious when you see things in context...

Unlike the outlawed Al-Samoud 2 missile, which was declared as a purportedly legal weapon, the drone was not declared. It would be the first undeclared weapons programme found by the UN and is considered by British and US officials to be a “smoking gun”.

Get a clue...

[Dinner]

Originally posted by GePap
So Iraq is not allowed crop dusters?

Nothing of the sort. You were the fanciful one declaring aerial chemical weapons delivery systems are such an advanced technology that Iraq couldn’t possibly possess them (didn’t you mention something about moon bases?). Sorry to burst your bubble and show how old and elementary they are; I'm sure you're disappointed. It doesn't take the moon bases or the rocket science which you so factiously spoke about; it just takes a pressurized tank and a spray nozzle.

BTW are you now contending that Saddam is using unmanned aerial drowns launched from military bases to dust crops? I hope you're not. Everyone in the know has accepted the truth so it is time you gave up the ghost and stop pissing in the wind. Saddam has made these unmanned aerial drones, which have spray nozzles on them, for the sole purpose of delivering chemical weapons. Just accept it and stop fighting the truth.

[GePap]

UR:

you are keeping this thread alive man..if you leave it, Drake and Oerdin wil be left simply to talk about how right each other is..which is invariably boring, they will stop posting, move on, and then this issue will end were it belongs..burried deep where no one will give it the light of day.

It is the sensible thing to do.

[Drake Tungsten]

I don't think the spy plane implies that Iraq has mass quantities of chemical weapons which it is willing to use at a whim... would be my more refined statement.

The drone doesn't give any indication of what kind of chemical weapons Iraq has. No one is claiming otherwise. The drone is significant because it was not declared by the Iraqis and is therefore proof that they lied on their weapons declaration. That's a material breach...

[Drake Tungsten]

UR:

you are keeping this thread alive man..if you leave it, Drake and Oerdin wil be left simply to talk about how right each other is..which is invariably boring, they will stop posting, move on, and then this issue will end were it belongs..burried deep where no one will give it the light of day.

It is the sensible thing to do.

I agree. Please stop posting, UR. I'd rather have my thread die than have to listen to anymore of your pathetic "arguments"...

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten

Also, the reasoning in your first sentence is suspect. He has the means to deliver chemical weapons, therefore he must have chemical weapons. The drone COULD be altered to carry chem weapons. Therefore he must have MILLIONS of vials of anthrax. It is possible to have guns without bullets... and chem weapons are a lot harder to come by than bullets.

Only grossly misinformed people seriously argue that Saddam doesn't have chemical and biological weapons. Welcome to the club...

He didn't say Saddam doesn't have any BCN weapons. He was saying you made logical blunders in your post.

[Dinner]

Originally posted by GePap
UR:

you are keeping this thread alive man..if you leave it, Drake and Oerdin wil be left simply to talk about how right each other is..which is invariably boring, they will stop posting, move on, and then this issue will end were it belongs..burried deep where no one will give it the light of day.

It is the sensible thing to do.

Translation: i have run out of logical arguements but I am to shallow to admite I am wrong. I shall there for pretend I just don't want to debate any more instead of being utterly defeated like I am.

[Kramerman]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
Are you going to make any real arguments, GePap, or are you just going to continue flapping your lips and making smilies? Deal with the thread topic or get out...

Good Job, Billy! *pats drake on the back*...

[Drake Tungsten]