The criminalization of opinion in Britain.

[Arrian]

Pattycakes, when you are the one making wild accusations, the burden of proof is on you. You are the one who must produce facts. Since the facts are not yet available, you don't have any.

Which is why this thread is 14 pages of

-Arrian

[Flubber]

This thread has gotten much better since I updated my ignore list LOL

Ozz-- no point arguing here. . . My interest in this case is piqued and I will keep track of developments. Once ALL the evidence is revealed, this individual case can be discussed intelligently. Until then, the best that can be done is discuss generalities

[Bereta_Eder]

The facts are from British and Greek sources and out for all to see who can read newspapers with accounts of both Greek and Brit intelligence and acquintances of him.


I have yet to hear any argument from you.

[Bereta_Eder]

yeah Flubber my cat still cries.


And also Arrian there is the "law" which is (suprise ) public.

And of course his "legitimate" arrest.

[Ben Kenobi]

(GHM/IFEX) - On 9 March 2000, Salonica judge Maria Robbi banned a best-selling book that was condemned by the Greek Orthodox Church because of passages about the possible sexual longings of Jesus Christ. She justified the ban as a means to prevent ''outbreaks of violence'' after religious zealots threatened to take action against the author and bookstores selling the book.

The ban will remain in effect until 16 May, when a hearing is to be held on a suit to permanently halt the sale of ''M to the Power of N'', written by former communist parliament deputy Mimis Androulakis. The ban only applies to Salonica and adjacent prefectures, which are the judge's area of jurisdiction. The book will be available in the rest of Greece.

At the same time, additional criminal charges for "blasphemy" have been filed by the Salonica prosecutor's office against the book's author and publisher.

The book contains fictional dialogues between women whose names all begin with the letter M. The central theme is misogyny in various aspects of life, including religion. One chapter mentions a possible sexual dimension in the relationship between Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene, a prostitute who became a follower.

The suit was filed by fundamentalist Orthodox and Byzantine history teacher Marios Pilavakis, who argues that Christ's life cannot be open to fictional reinterpretation. He has been joined by a mix of ultra-nationalists and religious fanatics. At the 8 March court hearing, dozens of black-robed priests and monks stormed the court house and Robbi's chambers, chanting ''blasphemers'' and ''antichrists'' at Androulakis' defense lawyer, Thomas Trikoukis, who was beaten by some protesters. No arrests were made, though such attacks committed in a courtroom are considered especially serious by the Greek penal code.

The church and its leader, Archbishop Christodoulos, refused to comment on the decision. But Metropolitan Kallinikos, a spokesman for the church's ruling body, said Androulakis had no right ''to insult millions of our faithful with what he has said about the leader of our faith.'' Nearly all political parties, writers' and journalists' unions and scholars have condemned attacks and court decisions against Androulakis.


Background Information
As Associated Press reported, with one exception, Greek publishers said they could not recall any book being banned in Greece since the fall of the 1967 to 1974 military dictatorship. Two years ago, a court banned a Greek language dictionary and ordered the author to remove an insulting reference, the abusive use of the word "Bulgarian," to refer to residents of Salonica. That decision came after a Salonica city council member filed a complaint. But the Supreme Court overturned the ban, saying that although the word's derogatory definition was legally insulting, constitutional guarantees on free speech did not allow books to be banned or censored (see IFEX alerts of 29 January 1999, 29 July and 27 May 1998). Nevertheless, the dictionary's author, Professor Babiniotis, did introduce the court-mandated changes in the second printing.

http://www.ifex.org/alerts/view.html?id=6299

How is the current law in Greece which permits this book to be banned, different from the law in Britain?

[Bereta_Eder]

You forgot to mention that these 2 bans were never passed and were overuled.

[Arrian]

My argument is simple. In order to intelligently discuss the matter, we have to wait for the trial to start to find out what evidence the government has. We only know part of the story at this point.

Yet you have already made up your mind. You don't need facts, obviously. All you need is a *hint* of something out of the ordinary, and you react like a trained attack dog. Full of venom, short on facts.

Such premature judgement is indicative of bias, or even bigotry.

When the trial begins, much more information will become public, and it will be possible to debate this case properly. Hey, you could even be right that the Brits screwed up! But you can't possibly know that yet, so all you're doing is making assumptions.

-Arrian

[Sprayber]

Originally posted by paiktis22
yeah Flubber my cat still cries.

Is your cat oppressed to?

[Ben Kenobi]

But the Supreme Court overturned the ban, saying that although the word's derogatory definition was legally insulting, constitutional guarantees on free speech did not allow books to be banned or censored.

Read my post next time Paiktis.

[Bereta_Eder]

I dont have one but if i did it would be filled with tears




Arrian, are you slow?


You have
_the "law"
_the illegal arrest

_the announcements of the brit "police", and several sources


and then you have the charges.


I'm begining to wonder if you understand



the "trial" is based on the "law" and the "arrest"


clear yet?

[Ozz]

Originally posted by paiktis22
read above I'm not going to repeat any of it.

Is that a promise? Seems that all you do is parrot the
same unfounded accusations over and over again.

I find it highly amusing that you so rabidly hate the
British, They really earned it, gave you a country and
your freedom, saved you from the turks on a number
of occassions, and saved and taught you your cultural
heritage and history.

Their reward, hated and treachery, Terroristism in
Crete and Cyprus.

Seems they failed on the teaching you the cultural
heritage part, the Ancient Athenians would have regarded you as barbarians.

And they would have been right.

[Bereta_Eder]

LOL

thank you Ozz for making it so easy.

[Bereta_Eder]

here's your cookie for amusing me

for example, I'm still waiting to hear:

any conveincing argument for the arrest except: ozz ramblings: well they arrested them so they're right doh


any conveincing argument about any other country having such a huge democratic deficit as britain does currently with its antiterrorist "law" except: well it protects us doh


any conveincing argument about how can this NOT be a blatant crimilization of opinion excpet that: (thats good) Greece sucks.



still waiting for arguments and facts?

crap can only get you so far.

[Arrian]

You have the dubious distinction of being the first OT poster to make my ignore list. Fairwell, Pattycakes.

:waves:

-Arrian

[Bereta_Eder]

Originally posted by obiwan18
But the Supreme Court overturned the ban, saying that although the word's derogatory definition was legally insulting, constitutional guarantees on free speech did not allow books to be banned or censored.



Read my post next time Paiktis.

Right sorry I missed that.


Arrian you havent offered anything really so I'll not miss you that much bye.