Massive World Protests Tomorrow

[Spiffor]

I didn't go to the rally in Stuttgart today (50 000 protestors according to Axi's figures... Not bad for a 500 000 inhab city ), because this night was the only one I could spend with my gf this week. No way I'd interrupt it at 11:00

[MOBIUS]

Originally posted by Asher

So basically, you realize that he doesn't care, and yet you let him know anyway? Do you realize how stupid that is?

I think you'll notice I couldn't be bothered marching...

Yeah, that's the ticket. Blair is calling the shots, Bush is his puppet.

Actually, every single time Bush has said 'that's it', Blair has been able to delay him. Each delay has been because of Blair. You know, I used to think that Blair was his puppet, but I've been changing my mind lately...

Mobius, Britain lost its status as a relevant power many years ago. It's the US' b*tch these days, much like most other western nations, whether they politely protest or refuse to send troops or not. No one will stop them.

Yes it did, coming to the aid of its allies and fighting evil while the US sat on the sidelines growing rich. Britain's debts to the US from WWII were its undoing. The day that Britain has to really choose between the US and Europe is fast approaching...

The US is the centerpiece for the modern world, chances are the rest of the world would be hurt more by the world turning its back on the US.

In the short to medium term maybe, but then revolutions are always messy...

[Demerzel]

Originally posted by Asher
The US is the centerpiece for the modern world, chances are the rest of the world would be hurt more by the world turning its back on the US.

back 20 plus years ago, that would have been very true but now the EU is fast growing and has an industry equal to the US ( though military spending is far far behind ). China and other countries are fast improving their economies and world reputations. Finally and possibly most damning for the US, is the fact that a lot of countries that were formally staunch US allies are finding that they more often than not recently disagree with US policy, e.g. Kyoto treaty. This will lead to the US being isolated if they do not stop persuing such unilateral policy decisions.

[Drake Tungsten]

Actually, every single time Bush has said 'that's it', Blair has been able to delay him. Each delay has been because of Blair. You know, I used to think that Blair was his puppet, but I've been changing my mind lately...

This is actually a good point. Blair has managed to gain Bush's ear and affect the shape of US policy. He did this by being a good ally. Blair has been loyal to the US by expressing his differences with Bush in private, not by openly opposing America in the UN. By being loyal and gaining Bush's trust, Blair has been far more effective than any other world leader in changing US policy. France and Germany could learn a thing or two about diplomacy from Blair...

[Spiffor]

I don't think the goverment of France or Germany really give a damn about the war, if they get their share of the oil cake (since the diplomatic storm has abated, I expect there will be a satisfying agreement for all governments soon, and France will hypocritically send the Charles de Gaulle, as well as many crews to support the US military, and Germany will relieve the US of much post-war costs).
However, the French and German public opinions are strongly against the war, and their governments have earned some cheap legitimacy very quickly. You'll hardly find someone in France who disagrees with Chirac on this issue. That allows Chirac to further destroy our welfare system and our public services without problems.

[Comrade Tribune]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
By being loyal and gaining Bush's trust, Blair has been far more effective than any other world leader in changing US policy.

Only he didn´t change it.

Much more to learn from that guy in North Korea. 'Mess with us, and you´ll lose the West Coast.'

Now *THIS* is an argument the United States understand.

Really a pity Iraq has no A-bombs.

[Demerzel]

Blair has managed to get Bush to weaken on smaller issues but has failed to cause any policy shifts. For the amount of political pressure Blair is now coming under, you've got to wonder if it was worth it.

Iraq is unlikely to be able to cause any significant causalties to any attacking American force and thus is "to be liberated". N.Korea could and probably would do severe damage to S.Korea and kill large numbers of their and US personnel. Thus it is "to be contained", comical.

[Comrade Tribune]

One could actually say North Korea is containing the US.

[Drake Tungsten]

Blair has managed to get Bush to weaken on smaller issues but has failed to cause any policy shifts.

Getting America to go to the UN was a major policy shift. Rumsfeld and Cheney wanted to avoid the UN altogether and were winning the debate until Blair and Powell managed to persuade Bush. Blair persuaded Bush to give the UN another chance, which France has managed to **** up nicely.

[Demerzel]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten

Blair has managed to get Bush to weaken on smaller issues but has failed to cause any policy shifts.

Getting America to go to the UN was a major policy shift. Rumsfeld and Cheney wanted to avoid the UN altogether and were winning the debate until Blair and Powell managed to persuade Bush. Blair persuaded Bush to give the UN another chance, which France has managed to **** up nicely.

hmm if it's true then I do humbly apologise old chap

I still feel that Blair is risking too much political capital trying to moderate Bush unless he has enough sway with him to stop the US attacking. If Blair can't stop Bush ordering the attack but can get the 2nd resolution then he'll survive and probably look pretty astute in his actions, but attack without it and he's pretty much toast. Public and MP ( esp. of his own party ) opinion is far too against it for him to stay afloat.

[Spiffor]

Drake :
Basically, you would have loved it if the UN only told to Bush : "you're great, go ahead and do whatever you want" ?
Maybe the role of the UN was to wholly agree with the superpower ?

[Sandman]

Me and 80000 others marched in Glasgow. A truly beautiful day for it too, with not a cloud in the sky (except for oil refineries and stuff like that). Everything was blanketed with frost, a good omen. Blair was scheduled to speak at the conference, so we had a good chance to let him know our feelings firsthand.

Unfortunately, Blair changed his speaking time and had fled the city before we arrived outside the conference hall. Still, it was pretty inspiring, with most of the Labour Party conference attendees coming out and joining in the rally.

[Drake Tungsten]

I still feel that Blair is risking too much political capital trying to moderate Bush unless he has enough sway with him to stop the US attacking.

Blair may indeed be risking his political career, but he's doing the best thing for the United Kingdom. He has shored up Britain's position as America's most favored ally, while France and Germany are on a straight course to America's doghouse.

[Comrade Tribune]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
...while France and Germany are on a straight course to America's doghouse.

To give the dog a good trashing?

I wish the dog stayed in its doghouse, and didn´t sniff around in other people´s affairs so much.

[Darius871]

Originally posted by MOBIUS

The reason for this war is unjust, it will only become just when used as a last resort - and not as a first resort as the americans intended!

Wasn't the first resort that Saddam would cooperate with the UN inspectors and actively disarm?

Originally posted by axi

and

Baghdad 100.000

I find it cute that the people who would actually get bombed barely have a showing, while armchair liberals thousands of miles away, who would have nothing to do with this war, gather by the millions. Strange, huh?