Old Europe left out in the cold?

[Winston]

That remark seemed a bit chauvinist to me, good Sir Ralph.

[Bereta_Eder]

Originally posted by lord of the mark



but how can it hurt the efforts for synthesis on the opposing views if it disagrees with NOTHING that is in the stated EU position

I leave your imagination to grasp how this is hurting the EU

[lord of the mark]

Originally posted by Sir Ralph


Now Saddams fate is sealed.

in fact his fate is sealed when the US attacks.
and it will be much easier for the US to go in with Britain, and greater support in the region.
And British support and better support in the region will be helped when France supports a 2nd UNSC resolution.
And each european state that contradicts the French position weakens the French bargaining position, and reduces the blackmail the US will have to pay for a French yes (and also reduces the amount of source damaging intell we will have to share)
Latvia may not matter as much as Spain or Italy, but it matters.

[Bereta_Eder]

it will be funny to see what an 80% opposition to the war in most of Europe will do for the US image when it attacks.


we're talking about 500.000 people who you are going to kill and yo're just ready to drink french wine.

how charmant

[Lord Merciless]

I'm pretty sure that Russia and France will vote to support the military actions in the end, making Schroeder looking absolutely stupid.

[Ogie Oglethorpe]

Exactly LotM.

OTOH there will undoubtedly be much nashing of teeth on both sides f the issue as to whether resumptionof hositilites 'gainst Iraq needs UN sanction. France and Germany undoubtedly will look at the softer language they brokered in UN1441 one way while US will look at it in other ways.

Regardless, and not that I am a unilaterilist in this matter but there never wwas a peace treaty only a ceasefire signed by the US. Part of the cease fire agreement meant abiding by the UN resolutions all of which have been broken.

A resumption of war is inevitabe. Noice I said resumption as it does not require UN sanctioning as it falls under the heading of the 1991 conflict.

[Kramerman]

Originally posted by Sikander


Try not to be so obtuse. Even destroyed weapons will leave traces, especially when there are tons of them. The Iraqis have offered no declaration that the X number of warheads catalogued in 1998 were destroyed in location Y (which is required by the current resolution), where you can still see some scraps. Nothing at all. The Iraqis are simply betting that the inspectors will not be able to find much without their cooperation, and are willing to let their friends on the Security Council (read: France) torpedo the war resolution regardless.

yup

TheStinger:
Im in agreence with you

[Kramerman]

Originally posted by paiktis22
we're talking about 500.000 people who you are going to kill and yo're just ready to drink french wine.
how charmant

[Spiffor]

Originally posted by Ned

80% of EU against the war and thats the way it is

Ok, then explain why.

As an example, I just recieved this in my mailbox. Sent by a fellow French-German student :

If you cannot find Osama, bomb Iraq !
If the markets are a drama, bomb Iraq.
If the terrorists are frisky,
Pakistan is looking shifty,
North Korea is too risky,
Bomb Iraq.

If we have no allies with us, bomb Iraq.
If we think someone has dissed us, bomb Iraq.
So to hell with the inspections,
Let's look tough for the elections,
Close your mind and take directions,
Bomb Iraq.

It's "pre-emptive non-aggression", bomb Iraq.
Let's prevent this mass destruction, bomb Iraq.
They've got weapons we can't see,
And that's good enough for me
'Cos it's all the proof I need
Bomb Iraq.

If you never were elected, bomb Iraq.
If your mood is quite dejected, bomb Iraq.
If you think Saddam's gone mad,
With the weapons that he had,
(And he tried to kill your dad),
Bomb Iraq.

If your corporate fraud is growin', bomb Iraq.
If your ties to it are showin', bomb Iraq.
If your politics are sleazy,
And hiding that ain't easy,
And your manhood's getting queasy,
Bomb Iraq.

Fall in line and follow orders, bomb Iraq.
For our might knows not our borders, bomb Iraq.
Disagree? We'll call it treason,
Let's make war not love this season,
Even if we have no reason,
Bomb Iraq.

[Dinner]

Spiffor that was written in the U.S. and has been floating around the internet for several months now.

[Spiffor]

oh, that's the first time I got it (granted I yell at most people sending me chainmails )
There is little doubt the US opponents to war have about the same reasons as EU opponents to war IMO

[Dinner]

I'd have to agree they see eye to eye on most things. Generally, I'd say they are of a similiar political out look as well.

[Drake Tungsten]

Thanks for ruining my thread, Paiktis...

[Ned]

Originally posted by Oerdin
I'd have to agree they see eye to eye on most things. Generally, I'd say they are of a similiar political out look as well.

The US Democratic party has had a long history of aggressive foreign policy. Think of Jefferson, Jackson, Polk, Roosevelt and Kennedy. They changed with the Vietnam war. Think of McGovern. Bill Clinton was very reluctant to use American power to fix the world. But when he did act, it he acted effectively.

I see the Democratic party today divided. A significant number supported and continue to support Bush on Iraq. There are others, primarily from the Northeast, who are pacifist, including president Kennedy's own brother. But there are others, such as Hilary Clinton, who gave president Bush standing ovations last Tuesday.

It will be interesting to see how the next presidential race shapes up. The Democrats may have to choose their candidate based on whether he or she supported the War, or whether they opposed. Democrats tend to agree on most other issues.

[Fidel]

Originally posted by lord of the mark
Neither was it about FOPGian roles in supporting massacres in the balkans, nor in equating local acts of revenge by Kosovars with a planned genocide by the serbs.

I believe the last sentence was a joke or you started believing in Whorla del Pontes political hogwash. Especially coming from someone cheering for a war of agression.