Announcement

**Kramerman** · September 22, 2002, 01:26

I also think this site is biased, but oh well. thgis is me, i guess, *sigh*

**Gatekeeper** · September 22, 2002, 01:36

What the heck is it with all the Tony Blairs around here?!

Gatekeeper

**KrazyHorse** · September 22, 2002, 01:51

We've got a lot of indecisive followers...

**KrazyHorse** · September 22, 2002, 01:52

well, that just slipped right by the autocensor, didn't it...

**Boris Godunov** · September 22, 2002, 01:53

Ahem

**KrazyHorse** · September 22, 2002, 01:55

Yes?

You can't tell me you've never had a fantasy where good old Tony gave you the same sort of fawning attention he gives Curious George...

**KrazyHorse** · September 22, 2002, 01:56

"Tony Blair: he's not good for much, but at least he knows who his daddy is"

**Boris Godunov** · September 22, 2002, 01:57

I can.

Just a little surprised at you...doesn't seem your style.

**KrazyHorse** · September 22, 2002, 01:59

How so?

Usually the autocensor takes care of the nasty words for me...

Happy now?

**Boris Godunov** · September 22, 2002, 02:03

Well, we don't need to get into it. I just find it an offensive derogatory term.

**Shi Huangdi** · September 22, 2002, 02:08

Getting Tony Blair = Wussy answers

**KrazyHorse** · September 22, 2002, 02:15

Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Well, we don't need to get into it. I just find it an offensive derogatory term.

Aha...

But I don't. It is merely descriptive (and not just of gays, Boris...but of something like 50% of the population)

When fellatio is performed, even if it is mutually satisfying, there is always a servicer...and a servicee. I was suggesting that Blair is a definite servicer. And this is not just bull**** on my part, but my actual thought process. I removed it because the term is overly graphic for the medium...not because I feel the need to satisfy your objection (which is unfounded, in my opinion)

**KrazyHorse** · September 22, 2002, 02:19

Should I be offended if someone is called a...well, a similar term relating to what is done to a female?

**Adalbertus** · September 22, 2002, 02:35

I'm Blair ... And he's still some decent abilities compared to Schröder ...

**Boris Godunov** · September 22, 2002, 02:44

Originally posted by Frogger
Should I be offended if someone is called a...well, a similar term relating to what is done to a female?

So, when, say, those two guys in Wyoming had Matthew Shepard tied to a fence and, as they beat him to death, referred to him as a "c*cksucker," they were thinking of it as merely a rational description of his sexual preferred position?

I certainly didn't feel so assured of its harmlessness when, exiting a gay bar with some friends one time, a group of thugs nearby started making remarks like "look at the c*cksuckers," in the same manner in which they employed the word "******s."

Now come on--the word is a derogatory insult that has always been a slur against gays. I can't say of ever hearing it used in reference to women. It is used to insult men, challenging their "manliness" by inferring they are gay. Or just to degrade gays to their faces.

I don't think you could blame anyone for taking offense to its use.

Announcement

Which dictator are you?

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment