Aren't the username and flag you've chosen redundant?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
sad thoughts on poly posters
Collapse
X
-
12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
-
Originally posted by tinyp3nis
Hey Serb, i would really much like to know your side of the story what happened in the winterwar of 39, i have heard the finnish side here way too often and i know all the facts allready, but i have allways wanted to hear the russian version of what really happened. I really havent got the chance to hear it earlier, but it has allways bugged me since i have been hearing the soviet version is way different what really happened(or finnish ppl say what happened)....
You dont have to reply, but im just too curious not to ask about it, just in case u have info.
Comment
-
Russo-Finnish frontier was only 32 km away from Leningrad- our Northern capital. Stalin beleived that in case of war with Germany, Hitler will use Finland as bridgehead to attack Soviet Union (which Hitler done in 1941). He offered to remove frontier a bit far away from Leningrad. He offered larger Soviet lands in exchange for Finnish lands near Leningrad. They refused. He ordered to took this land by force. .
Comment
-
Or that all men with small penises are Finns.12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
I thought it was pretty good, actually...12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
I'm not anti-USA, just anti-US government as world policeman if it's not going to travel the full mile, and/or doesn't solve it's own problems first.
Regarding WWII...
USSR would certainly have defeated Nazi Germany on its own with no US aid, just that the war may have dragged on to about 1946-47. Lend lease was important in making things easier, but it wasn't vital nor necessary to the success of the Russian war effort; it just positively contributed to the build up.
In any case, Germany could never have won the war outright against the Russians, not unless you introduce several massive changes...
1941: Only theoretical chance at a real "win" to the war, but would have required an earlier and faster Barbarossa concentrated not just on one objective, but without Hitler's interference, bad weather, much greater than expected quantity and quality of Russian tanks, general laziness of the German war economy, arrival of the Siberian reinforcements and the obstructions of several ancient-minded generals in the German Heer.
1942: important victories were possible in the Caucasus OR Stalingrad, that could have caused serious problems for the Russians, but from an overall economic and strategic perspective, it was too late to permanently defeat them. A long stalemate of several years could have resulted generally in Germany's favor, but Russian economic superiority and adaptability just couldn't be overturned decisively by then.
1943: the last chance Germany had to at least provoke anything like a stalemate (at most a temporary one) if Manstein's advice had been followed, but they also messed that up before-and-at Kursk, and had to resort to just delaying the Russians...
1944: a catastrophe, and 1945: a very tragic joke.DULCE BELLUM INEXPERTIS
Comment
-
I wouldn't say lazy. My understanding is the Germany had limited industrial capability. Unlike in American where we could designate factories to build just one thing for the duration of the war, Germany had to run a bit of this and then a bit of that and switch again at a lot of their plants.
So, Hitler's overconfidence could have lead to bad planning but thats not laziness.
Comment
Comment