Originally posted by Boris Godunov
JM - I believe the opposite. As I said, moderators are not qualified psychologists who can make the judgement call that such threats are harmless and the person making them has no intention of following through. If they are to err on the side of caution, that caution is harsh treatment of the offending poster. Real people have been murdered by online nutballs, so I don't think it's unrealistic.
It was a hypothetical situation with Ming. I wouldn't ever threaten to contact anyone's family from here, as I think that's an utterly reprehensible threat to make.
JM - I believe the opposite. As I said, moderators are not qualified psychologists who can make the judgement call that such threats are harmless and the person making them has no intention of following through. If they are to err on the side of caution, that caution is harsh treatment of the offending poster. Real people have been murdered by online nutballs, so I don't think it's unrealistic.
It was a hypothetical situation with Ming. I wouldn't ever threaten to contact anyone's family from here, as I think that's an utterly reprehensible threat to make.
while wrong, it is not something that is super serious (now if it was actually done that would be serious, or if SuperSneak kept doing it)
people on this site have threatened eachother with violence fairly often, what you do to people whoare that upset is that you remove them and hope that they will cool down
that is what was done here
Jon Miller
Comment