Che, that would actually made sense, because, in the bible , Joseph is a Viceroy ( of sorts ) , and It is later told that the government has changed , and the next pharoh didn't like the Hebrews. I'd say that the farther back we go in the bible, the less true are the stories. The exodus is in that "grain of truth area". One thing I am not sure of. I thought that the philistines are part of the hyksos?!
The time when the exodus took place was reconstructed by some historians as a sort of "world war" in which almost every nation between Greece, Egypt and Mesopotamia was involved. (Again, I haven't read too largely about it.) The Trojan war was only a part of it. Another part was the exodus. Egypt mainly opposed the Hethites (which wasn't directly mentioned in the Bible). Egypt had built up a large military industry - of which archeological proofs were found - and many peoples, certainly not only Jews - were forced to work for it under hard conditions. Reading the Bible, the Hethites look just like a minor tribe in the Sinai, but they definitely weren't. Anyway, Moses married a daughter of a Hethite leader. From this I would conclude that the Jews changed side.
Of course, the reports about Egypt still may be fiction - but if so, a well made one.
Btw. The Egyptian period of the Hyskos is 1786-1567BC (if I can believe the internet page where I found it ...)
The Phoenicians gave us the alphabet (hence the word phonetics, etc). But they were originally Greek refugees.
Comment