The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Ned: You may be interested to read this. I won't vouch for the site cause I simply don't know what organization it represents. But it makes some good points against India. When it comes down to it, don't you think India should see what the people of Kashmir want before it goes about with a war that may kill hundreds of millions of people and diminish the lives of all those living on the sub continent and most likely everyone near the region. India is supposed to be a democracy after all.
The muslim terrorist are wrong for their methods, but I think India isn't acting much better.
ummah.org.uk is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, ummah.org.uk has it all. We hope you find what you are searching for!
ummah.org.uk is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, ummah.org.uk has it all. We hope you find what you are searching for!
Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh
Sprayber, the cite is interesting in that it quoted Mountbatten as the original autor of the concept that the final question of accession had to be settled by plebiscite.
Everyone is on the same page, I believe. Pakistan and India should agree on an UN-supervised plebiscite. However, how do we get from here to there without a war?
Originally posted by Ned
Everyone is on the same page, I believe. Pakistan and India should agree on an UN-supervised plebiscite. However, how do we get from here to there without a war?
If I could answer that I would be known as Sprayber the wise, children would sing songs about me, maidens would dedicate their virtue to my name and I would have several high schools named after me.
Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh
No big deal. The US has never ruled out the possibility to use nuclear weapons in any wars either.
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
This is horrible, just imagine all the poor people in cities like New Delhi and Karachi that will die. This could be the worst catastrophe in human history.
Would Pakistan accept an indepenend Kasmir with a completely democratic and secular government that does everything possible to fight all those who use terrorism?
But if you say that India is bad because it doesn't let Kamsir go must you also condemt China for not allowing to let Tibet go. I think that the majority of Tibet would prefere both Independance and joining India above being a part of China.
Maybe this is just wishful thinking, but I find it inconceivable that anyone would actually use nuclear weapons, expecially when the other side has them too.
Originally posted by Ned
Maybe this is just wishful thinking, but I find it inconceivable that anyone would actually use nuclear weapons, expecially when the other side has them too.
Yes it is basically saying: We don't mind if our people die as long as those of the enemy also die. The damage of a nuclear war would be much more then what Kasmir is worth. For Paksitan is starting a nuclear war suicide, for India is it suicide of it's northern provinces, every leader who could even consider that is an inhuman beast and should be taken of power.
I think whole Jasmir(Pakistan part+Indian part+Chinees part) can best become an indepenent secular state that is completely neutral(they a
Originally posted by Ned
Maybe this is just wishful thinking, but I find it inconceivable that anyone would actually use nuclear weapons, expecially when the other side has them too.
Yes the damage caused by a nuclear war would be much biggger then what Kasmir is worth.For Pakistan is it suicide for India is it suicide of it's Northern cities. Any leader who would even consider that is an inhumane beast and should be taken of power.
Just organize a poll in India and Pakistand: Are you willing to be anilated by nukes in order to gain kasmir? I'm sure the majority would say no.
MSNBC breaking news and the latest news for today. Get daily news from local news reporters and world news updates with live audio & video from our team.
Originally posted by kolpo
Would Pakistan accept an indepenend Kasmir with a completely democratic and secular government that does everything possible to fight all those who use terrorism?
Would the Kashmiri citizens accept an independent Kashmir with a completely democratic and secular government that does everything possible to fight all those who use terrorism?
"Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master" - Commissioner Pravin Lal.
Comment