Where do you draw the line???

[SpencerH]

Its not impossible, but body armour is not customarily worn by your traditional class of crook.

[Akka]

Originally posted by SpencerH
Its not impossible, but body armour is not customarily worn by your traditional class of crook.

I advise the free selling of rockets and tanks to be able to defend yourself against this kind of bandits.
Remember, when tanks are outlawed, only outlaws have tanks !

[SpencerH]

If you remember the incident in LA with the armoured bank robbers, you might have thought it appropriate for the police to have had a tank on that day.

On second thought, given their accuracy with the weapons they had maybe not

[Akka]

Originally posted by SpencerH
If you remember the incident in LA with the armoured bank robbers, you might have thought it appropriate for the police to have had a tank on that day.

On second thought, given their accuracy with the weapons they had maybe not

Ah, I don't remember anything about it, but it seems that outlaws outgunned the police.

Ok, I suppose it's time to start selling Apache.
If you are attacked by tanks in street, what you would do ? Call the police ?


No, by the time the police come, you're dead meat. If everyone had a Apache fully loaded with rockets, outlaws would think twice before robbering people with tanks !

Remember, when Apaches fully loaded with rockets are outlawed, only outlaws has Apaches fully loaded with rockets.

[Tom201]

Hehe, jop and everyone needs a nuclear handgranate alla Starship Troppers to defend himself against ruthless insects

[MrFun]

Originally posted by SpencerH


Were you refering to the war of northern aggression?

I call it the War of Southern Stupidity.



Oh, and Sikander --- is it your usual tactic to simply call all arguments that you disagree with, as merely based on propaganda??

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by Sikander
Gun regulations are symptoms of failed law enforcement efforts.

Oh, is that so? Got any evidence to back it up?

[SpencerH]

Originally posted by MrFun

I call it the War of Southern Stupidity.

While you're safe in Iowa you may call it what you wish. If you ever visit the south I wouldn't suggest you refer to it in that way. Not everyone is as open minded as I.

[Guynemer]

As long as you promise not to call it the War of Northern Aggression when you come up here. If you do, you'll find out just how aggressive we can get.

[TCO]

Originally posted by Guynemer


Beg pardon? It's late and I can't be arsed to read through this whole thread...

I meant using your Dr. Hook ability...

[MrFun]

Originally posted by SpencerH


While you're safe in Iowa you may call it what you wish. If you ever visit the south I wouldn't suggest you refer to it in that way. Not everyone is as open minded as I.

I have a radical idea --- why not mutually respect each other by calling it for what it was -- a Civil War.

I don't see how the more neutral Civil War title is insulting to Southerners.

But if Southerners want to continue insulting Northerners by calling it the War of Northern Agression, I might have to stick with mine -- the War of Southern Stupidity.

[SpencerH]

A civil war is within one country. The south had seceded therefore whatever you call it, by definition, it wasnt a civil war.

[Carver]

Originally posted by Tom201
Since handguns are owned for self-defence the use of AP ammunition is obvious. What if the criminal that atacks you wears some sort of Armor?

He will still be thrown to the ground and you can get away. But that's not enough for the gun nuts. You have a hunger to kill the alleged attacker, don't you?

[Carver]

Originally posted by SpencerH
A civil war is within one country. The south had seceded therefore whatever you call it, by definition, it wasnt a civil war.

The South had seceded in its own mind. To the rest of the world it was still part of the U.S.

[Guynemer]

Originally posted by GP


I meant using your Dr. Hook ability...

Ahhh, yes, I see. Step right up folks... a number of you could desperately use some humbling.