Should Homosexuals Recieve A Tax Deduction?

[WhiteElephants]

Originally posted by MrFun


Fine -- let me take a shot at having fun with Wiglaf's trolling, hatred, and ignorance.

Heterosexuals who are not reproducing through sexual intercourse should get a tax-break since they must be mentally ill. After all, they're not fulfilling their natural function.

Atta boy! Go get 'em tiger!

[Tuberski]

Originally posted by MrFun


Fine -- let me take a shot at having fun with Wiglaf's trolling, hatred, and ignorance.

Heterosexuals who are not reproducing through sexual intercourse should get a tax-break since they must be mentally ill. After all, they're not fulfilling their natural function.

Much better, and according to Wiglaf's logic, correct.

[Asher]

Originally posted by Wiglaf
Most gay couples adopt, asher.

What does that have to do with anything?!
You're equating people who don't want to reproduce with homosexuals, which is WRONG. There are PLENTY of heterosexuals who prefer to not have kids, ever. There are people on BOTH sides of the fence.

Admit you're wrong, move on.

[KrazyHorse]

Most gay couples adopt, asher

Unlikely. Also irrelevant.

[MrFun]

You know what -- you guys are right. This helps calm my nerves a bit by having fun with Wiglaf's ignorance. Thanks for the tip, guys.

So, if we can prove that heterosexuals who do not naturally reproduce are mentally ill, then a tax break would be legitimate??

Should this tax break be implemented on the state level or the federal level? How much for each bracket of income??

[Wiglaf]

If we're going to be making unverified claims

Ever heard of the human metabolism, KH?

there are heterosexuals who are born without the urge to make babies.

They're born with the urge to have sex with someone of the opposite gender, that's for sure. Therefore, biologically, they are "normal". They do not have the disorder and should not recieve a deduction.

Heterosexual who are not reproducing through sexual intercourse should get a tax-break since they must be mentally ill. After all, they're not fulfilling their natural function.

That's basically what KH said (see above).

[KrazyHorse]

If reproduction is the goal then why is the urge to engage in intercourse with an accompanying urge to avoid parenthood positive?

[WhiteElephants]

Originally posted by Wiglaf

They're born with the urge to have sex with someone of the opposite gender, that's for sure. Therefore, biologically, they are "normal".

Oh! Mr. Science pants changing his tune again! I thought this was all about reproduction?

[Tuberski]

WIGLAF!

You still haven't said where I can find info on the obese tax break!

[KrazyHorse]

It's been all over the news.

[Tuberski]

Originally posted by KrazyHorse
It's been all over the news.

Hmmmm, guess i should get out of bed before 1PM.

[WhiteElephants]

I'm curious. How do they (the Feds) know you're obese or not? I there some special form you get from your doctor or something?

[MrFun]

Back to heterosexuals who do not naturally reproduce.

Obviously, those "deviants" are mentally unstable, or mentally ill. They gotta get SOME kind of tax break.

[KrazyHorse]

Originally posted by Tuberski


Hmmmm, guess i should get out of bed before 1PM.

Scroll down. Info on tax break is near bottom.

http://money.cnn.com/2002/04/04/pf/taxes/q_obesity/index.htm

[WhiteElephants]

Originally posted by MrFun
Back to heterosexuals who do not naturally reproduce.

Obviously, those "deviants" are mentally unstable, or mentally ill. They gotta get SOME kind of tax break.

Damn straight! We need a masturbation tax!

"Masturbation without taxation!"