I'm a Canadian and biased but
1. as a layperson it was obvious the Canadians were flawless in a program they have done before in international competition and garnered top marks. Why would the same program done BETTER garner lower marks ?
2. The professional commentators were certain of the Canadian victory before the marks were announced. These are professional skaters who should have a clue about what is going on. I have never seen them be this emphatic about a result and be wrong and Canadians have come close to gold many times in the past in skating events with no outcry.
3. The reactions of Sale and pelltier themselves made it obvious they knew they had nailed the program and the look of suprise and shock on their faces at the marks was obvious and genuine. They KNEW they had won. They are experienced skaters that have competed for many years. Are we saying that the skaters themselves are wrong?? Did not everyone see the dejected demeanour of the Russians after they skated . . . they KNEW they had not skated well.
4. As I understand figure skating scoring, it is all about rankings. If the 2nd place in the short program wins the long program, they win the competition. They do not aggregate the marks so if the Canadians won the long program the gold was theirs.
5. Arguments about the greater difficulty just don't cut it . Doing slightly harder things badly does not qualify for higher marks. Consider the mens program where skaters who attempted and failed on a quad were marked much lower than skaters that cleanly completed a triple. To get credit for the harder element, you have to complete it successfully.
This is ice dance all over again.
1. as a layperson it was obvious the Canadians were flawless in a program they have done before in international competition and garnered top marks. Why would the same program done BETTER garner lower marks ?
2. The professional commentators were certain of the Canadian victory before the marks were announced. These are professional skaters who should have a clue about what is going on. I have never seen them be this emphatic about a result and be wrong and Canadians have come close to gold many times in the past in skating events with no outcry.
3. The reactions of Sale and pelltier themselves made it obvious they knew they had nailed the program and the look of suprise and shock on their faces at the marks was obvious and genuine. They KNEW they had won. They are experienced skaters that have competed for many years. Are we saying that the skaters themselves are wrong?? Did not everyone see the dejected demeanour of the Russians after they skated . . . they KNEW they had not skated well.
4. As I understand figure skating scoring, it is all about rankings. If the 2nd place in the short program wins the long program, they win the competition. They do not aggregate the marks so if the Canadians won the long program the gold was theirs.
5. Arguments about the greater difficulty just don't cut it . Doing slightly harder things badly does not qualify for higher marks. Consider the mens program where skaters who attempted and failed on a quad were marked much lower than skaters that cleanly completed a triple. To get credit for the harder element, you have to complete it successfully.
This is ice dance all over again.
Comment