Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alexander the great was gay? Backlash stirring in U.S. over gay film

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Alexander's Horse


    I think the Macedonian army has been reliably estimated at between 35 and 50,000. The point was that the Persian army was significantly larger, outnumbering the Macedonian at up to 4 or 5 to 1 in cavalry for example at Issus and Gaugamela.

    The Persian army was very large partly because the point was not to fight but to frighten with a large display of force. The expectation was an enemy would be intimidated and turn back or seek peace. The problem the Persians always had with Greek armies was they chose to fight and that showed up the weaknesses in the Persian order of battle.

    In some ways it was a huge culture clash.
    Ehm, The Persians had Greeks as their main fighting force against the Macedonians so it wasn't that much of a culture clash...
    And yeah I know most tribesmen weren't that impressive fighters vs an organized army, but still... It's hard to imagine how in those times with those means of transport and communication they managed to field and feed such huge armies, and the upkeep!!

    Btw how can you positively estimate an army number? There aren't enough archaeological finds to extrapolate that. Maybe a good terrain study might do the trick, I don't know
    "An archaeologist is the best husband a women can have; the older she gets, the more interested he is in her." - Agatha Christie
    "Non mortem timemus, sed cogitationem mortis." - Seneca

    Comment


    • Trajanus, I suppose an army could carry with it supplies for a limited time. But they still would have to be resupplied. One could just imagine the traffic over a very inadequate road system of carts moving back and forth supplying such a huge army. I suppose one could conduct studies to see just how large an army a certain logistics environment could support.
      http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

      Comment


      • Originally posted by MarkG
        yeah, on what grounds do egyptians keep on selling tickets to the Pyramids? they should be free to the world!
        The fact that it's rather difficult to remove the Pyramids from sovereign Egyptian territory?

        Comment


        • If Pekka wasn't there we should make a new one.. wonder how he was created in the first place?
          I will never understand why some people on Apolyton find you so clever. You're predictable, mundane, and a google-whore and the most observant of us all know this. Your battles of "wits" rely on obscurity and whenever you fail to find something sufficiently obscure, like this, you just act like a 5 year old. Congratulations, molly.

          Asher on molly bloom

          Comment


          • Originally posted by MarkG
            molly, i fail to see what's gay about the achilles/patroclos vase you link too....
            It's illustrating the older/younger relationship between Achilles and Patroklos, not the sexual nature of their relationship.


            Patroklos is the bearded one, having his wounds dressed by the youthful clean shaven Achilles.
            Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

            ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Trajanus


              Ehm, The Persians had Greeks as their main fighting force against the Macedonians so it wasn't that much of a culture clash...
              No that isn't right - Greek hoplite mercenaries were a major part of the force at Granicus but after that not so significant - and they were unreliable and acting under Persian orders.

              On the culture clash point, the Greeks and Persians saw warfare in very different ways for cultural and historical reasons and this has a huge influence on all the battles. What made the Macedonians lethal was partly their battle order which combined solid heavy infantry with superb shock cavalry, but also the their death or glory, or fight to the death attitude to battle. This was not the Asian way and completely mystified Darius II and the Persian nobles.
              Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..

              Look, I just don't anymore, okay?

              Comment

              Working...
              X