Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

380 TONS of Explosives (HMX, RDX) in Iraq Left Unsecured, Now Looted!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NBC News: Explosives Were Gone When U.S. Troops Arrived
    Susan Jones, CNSNews.com
    Tuesday, Oct. 26, 2004
    NBC News reported Monday night that 380 tons of missing explosives were already gone when U.S. troops arrived at the Al-Qaqaa weapons installation in April 2003 – one day after Saddam's government was toppled.

    NBC should know. It had a reporter embedded with the U.S. troops when they arrived at Al-Qaqaa in April 2003.

    While the Kerry campaign blasted the Bush administration for "stunning incompetence" on Monday, many Bush supporters questioned the timing of the New York Times' report Monday about the missing explosives, just eight days before the presidential election.
    NBC News correspondent Jim Miklaszewski suggested a political motive as well: In his report on the missing explosives Monday night, he quoted one official as saying, "Recent disagreements between the administration and the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency makes this announcement appear highly political."

    According to the Times, the IAEA said it had warned the Bush administration about the need to secure the Al-Qaqaa facility before and after the war.

    Times' Bias Caught Again

    In a follow-up report on Tuesday, the Times did not mention the fact that NBC had an embedded reporter on the scene when the missing explosives were discovered - the day after Baghdad fell.

    Tuesday's report in the Times, headlined "Iraq Explosives Become Issue in Campaign," covers how the Bush administration "sought to explain the disappearance of 380 tons of high explosives in Iraq that American forces were supposed to secure."

    Bush's aides, Tuesday's article said, "tried to explain why American forces had ignored warnings from the International Atomic Energy Agency about the vulnerability of the huge stockpile of high explosives, whose disappearance was first reported on Monday by CBS and The New York Times."

    The Times' report portrayed the Bush administration as being on the defensive, trying to "minimize the importance of the loss" of the military explosives.

    The report noted that President Bush "never mentioned the disappearance of the high explosives during a long campaign speech in Greeley, Colo., about battling terrorism."

    "There are certainly some questions about when the explosives were missing," Kerry campaign adviser Howard Wolfson admitted on "Fox & Friends" early Tuesday. But Kerry's campaign is not expected to let the matter drop.

    In a press release late Monday night, the campaign accused Bush's campaign of trying to cover up its "failure" to secure the explosives.

    "Instead of distorting John Kerry's words, the Bush campaign is now falsely and deliberately twisting the reports of journalists. It is the latest pathetic excuse from an administration that never admits a mistake, no matter how disastrous," Kerry-Edwards senior adviser Joe Lockhart said.

    Copyright CNSNews.com
    Reminds me of Rathergate.

    Comment




    • Man, are you behind the curve...

      Notice, that is CNS saying NBC said something..of course, the supposed NBC source has already contradicted that story-in fact, that statement is already posted in this very thread.

      Do keep up, won't you?
      If you don't like reality, change it! me
      "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
      "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
      "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

      Comment


      • He's not behind the curve at all . . . . .


        he's on an entirely LOW, FLAT line altogether.
        A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

        Comment


        • Just on the radio, Brit Hume was saying there was another unit that went through the area before the unit with the embedded NCS crew did, and they didn't see anything either; since they spent less time there than the later unit, that probably doesn't mean much.

          On the other hand, the base was thoroughly searched on May 27, 2003, and the IAEA seals were definately not there at that point, so we do have a limit on how recently it could have happened.
          No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

          Comment


          • I'm still confused: is the media saying that all 380 tons were taken at the same time, or was it little by little over the past year and a half?
            "I predict your ignore will rival Ben's" - Ecofarm
            ^ The Poly equivalent of:
            "I hope you can see this 'cause I'm [flipping you off] as hard as I can" - Ignignokt the Mooninite

            Comment


            • On the other hand, the base was thoroughly searched on May 27, 2003, and the IAEA seals were definately not there at that point


              Source?
              "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
              -Bokonon

              Comment


              • I'm still confused: is the media saying that all 380 tons were taken at the same time, or was it little by little over the past year and a half?


                Little by little, most likely.
                "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
                -Bokonon

                Comment


                • Little by little, most likely.
                  Sounds like wishful thinking to me. You guys are so desperate to find something big but it's just not there. I do love the smell of desperation though. FOUR MORE YEARS!!!!

                  Comment


                  • I do love the smell of desperation though.

                    personally, i find it more palatable than the stench of rabid fanboism.

                    ml, what makes a good conservative?
                    B♭3

                    Comment


                    • Hehe, he'll never answer you Q, because he ain't one, so he can't tell .
                      “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                      - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                      Comment


                      • Hehe, he'll never answer you Q, because he ain't one, so he can't tell.


                        The extremes to which MalevolentLight and Mr. Nice Guy go to avoid direct questions makes me think they're the same person.

                        After all, they're both one-trick ponies, have faulty logic, don't post sensibly or coherently, and are rabid fanbois.

                        ML and MNG:
                        B♭3

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Ramo
                          On the other hand, the base was thoroughly searched on May 27, 2003, and the IAEA seals were definately not there at that point


                          Source?
                          Probably Drudge again.
                          Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

                          Comment


                          • What's CNS News?

                            Conservative New Scoundrals?
                            Golfing since 67

                            Comment


                            • Cybercast News Service... don't ask me, I just googled it.
                              “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                              - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Ramo
                                On the other hand, the base was thoroughly searched on May 27, 2003, and the IAEA seals were definately not there at that point


                                Source?
                                "Just on the radio, Brit Hume"
                                No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X