Welcome to John Howard's Redneck Wonderland

[Ned]

Originally posted by Urban Ranger

Fashionable anti-American is pathetic.

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by Gibsie
How many terms is Howard allowed, and how many before he gets made honorary President-for-life?

How many is Blair allowed, and how many before he gets made honorary President-for-life?

[Gibsie]

Well if he takes a fourth after specifically stating he'll stop after his third then I expect that will be as good a time as any. Care to answer my question, or after so long of never actually answering questions have you shed that ability like a pair of vestigial legs?

[Provost Harrison]

I don't think PMs are limited on terms...Thatcher was pushing the end of her third when he resigned. If Tony wins the next and lasts the rest of that term (looks very likely he will win the next election with their being no real opposition) he could succeed where Thatcher failed I don't think there is a limit on how many terms a PM can serve.

[DinoDoc]

I'm not an Aussie. How would I know? I would imagine as many as his party will care to give him.

[Gibsie]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
I'm not an Aussie. How would I know? I would imagine as many as his party will care to give him.

Here's a little tip: if you don't know the answer to a question, don't attempt to answer it, no matter how witty you might think you're being.

[Whaleboy]

Ned, I don't think I've seen you advance a single argument this week, only a vain attempt to portray anything that isn't fourteen inches up Bush's rectum or likewise his allies, policy or rhetoric to be somehow offensive to you, or internally ridiculous. Ordinarily, that wouldn't be of any concern to me, however, what does worry me is you take yourself so seriously .

[DinoDoc]

Why should I be held to a higher standard than the other posters here!

[Ned]

Originally posted by Whaleboy
Ned, I don't think I've seen you advance a single argument this week, only a vain attempt to portray anything that isn't fourteen inches up Bush's rectum or likewise his allies, policy or rhetoric to be somehow offensive to you, or internally ridiculous. Ordinarily, that wouldn't be of any concern to me, however, what does worry me is you take yourself so seriously .

Whaleboy, I haven't posted in a week. So, I think you are right about my lack of argument this week.

[Whaleboy]

A week, a day, meh same difference, you suck either way .

[Ned]

Originally posted by Whaleboy
A week, a day, meh same difference, you suck either way .

Whaleboy, you really are a one-note Johnny. You preach a philosophy of moral relativism incessantly. Do you ever really think?

[Whaleboy]

Excuse me, *I'm* a "one-note Johnny"?

I take it you disagree with relativism then?

[Ned]

Originally posted by Whaleboy
Excuse me, *I'm* a "one-note Johnny"?

I take it you disagree with relativism then?

Not entirely. But philosophy should be about the search for truth, not an excuse for depravity.

[Ned]

BTW, Whaleboy, you should study law. Judges constantly must make decisions based that are based on judgments of right and wrong. You'd love it.

[Whaleboy]

Why should philosophy obey your rule? It means literally "love of wisdom" which introduces three concepts, love, of (that is, subject to predicate) and wisdom, all of which are open for debate. And depravity? Care to elaborate?