Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Your Reactions to the Second Presidential Debate

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Albert Speer
    MrFun:

    thats one of those questions that you get in school that ticks you off cause it should be easy but your mind can't think like that... it's one of those touchy-feely questions. you think Bush could just come up with 3 things (why in god's name did she pick 3? aint that a bit much?) that he considers mistakes and outline them in 2 minutes? yeah right. that was a bad question.
    If a president cannot even admit to mistakes and learn from them, would you want him/her as president?
    A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Harry Tuttle


      I'm critiqueing! I just think Bush won.
      I'm critiqueing! I just think Edwards OMFGMEGAPWND Cheney because Cheney is evil!
      Eventis is the only refuge of the spammer. Join us now.
      Long live teh paranoia smiley!

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by OzzyKP


        Yes. I think he answered that question as well as he could considering it was quite loaded. Besides, there were huge dodges by both of them in many questions. Particularly as Diss noted, the deficit question I really wanted to hear how their numbers stacked up.

        Both must be using "fuzzy math" because their numbers can't possibly compute. Both propose new spending, both promise tax cuts, and both want to cut the deficit in half. Ummm. Doesn't work. Gibson was great for really pressing that issue, asking both of them several times to put up some numbers, but both refused to do so. That should bother you more, Fun.

        True . . . . . . you and Diss have a point there.
        A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Albert Speer
          MrFun:

          thats one of those questions that you get in school that ticks you off cause it should be easy but your mind can't think like that... it's one of those touchy-feely questions. you think Bush could just come up with 3 things (why in god's name did she pick 3? aint that a bit much?) that he considers mistakes and outline them in 2 minutes? yeah right. that was a bad question.
          I thought it was an odd question, and not really a fair one, but given that the administration gives the distinct impression that it never makes a mistake, and given that the press mentions it semi-regularly, I wasn't that surprised it was asked. I was surprised that it made it to air, but not that it was one of the questions submitted by the audience.
          "In the beginning was the Word. Then came the ******* word processor." -Dan Simmons, Hyperion

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Comrade Tassadar
            I'm critiqueing! I just think Edwards OMFGMEGAPWND Cheney because Cheney is evil!
            Foul! I demand an inquiry. That second quote is not by me!

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Harry Tuttle


              Foul! I demand an inquiry. That second quote is not by me!
              They both have about as much credibility
              Eventis is the only refuge of the spammer. Join us now.
              Long live teh paranoia smiley!

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Comrade Tassadar
                They both have about as much credibility
                Oooh, dead stem cell babies will haunt your dreams.

                Comment


                • #68
                  If a president cannot even admit to mistakes and learn from them, would you want him/her as president?
                  why don't you just get to the point and ask him if he thought the war in iraq was a mistake. that was the whole crux of the issue, the underlining reasoning that wasn't outright said... and bush addressed that. move on. it's not an issue to be hanged up about.
                  "Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
                  "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Harry Tuttle


                    Oooh, dead stem cell babies will haunt your dreams.

                    Eventis is the only refuge of the spammer. Join us now.
                    Long live teh paranoia smiley!

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Both propose new spending, both promise tax cuts, and both want to cut the deficit in half. Ummm. Doesn't work.
                      Actually, it does make sense. Economic growth is healthy, which raises tax revenues even if you aren't "raising taxes." As long as you keep spending increases below about 7% a year (or an equal amount in tax cuts), the deficit will be reduced.
                      I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        and tass, your poll numbers are a joke, right?
                        "Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
                        "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Albert Speer


                          why don't you just get to the point and ask him if he thought the war in iraq was a mistake. that was the whole crux of the issue, the underlining reasoning that wasn't outright said... and bush addressed that. move on. it's not an issue to be hanged up about.

                          I have the right to choose whatever I want to be ossessively hung up about.



                          ok . . . . . . . let's move on
                          A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            I think it wasn't just Iraq; I think it was the overall reality distortion field that surrounds the administration and makes them believe they're never wrong.
                            "In the beginning was the Word. Then came the ******* word processor." -Dan Simmons, Hyperion

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Albert Speer
                              and tass, your poll numbers are a joke, right?
                              Um, no. You can go look at it yourself if you want
                              Eventis is the only refuge of the spammer. Join us now.
                              Long live teh paranoia smiley!

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by MrFun


                                If a president cannot even admit to mistakes and learn from them, would you want him/her as president?
                                do you really think Kerry could answer that question any better about Kerry's own mistakes?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X