Best debater award

[Zylka]

UR: that whole editing spiel took you near 8 redundant post changes, countless UBB * ups, and the apparent indecision of a 6 year old schoolgirl.

Having only pity for an opposition of this caliber; it's time for this thread to again become lame. I have a sebacious cyst on my bumcheek to go drain, instead

[molly bloom]

Originally posted by Zylka


Having only pity for an opposition of this caliber; it's time for this thread to again become lame. I have a sebacious cyst on my bumcheek to go drain, instead

The cheek of it.


Happy glous glous de vidange.

[Asher]

Originally posted by molly bloom
I nominate Agathon, for tenaciously running logical rings around Asher- although that's not that difficult.

You should see the iTunes thread.

[Ted Striker]

Agathon gets DESTROYED by Asher in every technical debate

Asher has the distinction of actually knowing what the hell he is talking about

[Fake Boris]

Originally posted by Asher

You should see the iTunes thread.

Actually, you both agreed but kept arguing for no reason.

[Asher]

Originally posted by Oncle Boris
Actually, you both agreed but kept arguing for no reason.

Nah, Agathon never really agreed.

You see, he maintains measurements are useless.

[Ben Kenobi]

"Hate is sometimes as mysterious as love...'

[Urban Ranger]

Not quite, rabbit, not quite.

[wrt your characterization of them as flame warriors]

[monkspider]

Asher wouldn't be a bad debater if he didn't let his loyalties blind his judgement so dramatically. He does posess a respectable level of knowledge regarding Technology. But he is just so devoted to proving every last aspect of anything Microsoft (or Intel) does to be right, and every last thing that Apple or Linux does to be wrong, that it is hard to take him seriously. This causes him to take often very illogical positions in a debate.

In fact, it has gotten so bad that I have learned to view the truth as the opposite of whatever Asher says regarding most computer matters. It's a shame really, because I suspect that he would have a lot of good things to say if he just learned to see things more clearly and not view every debate as a chance to try to prove his preconceived notions.

[Asher]

Originally posted by monkspider
Asher wouldn't be a bad debater if he didn't let his loyalties blind his judgement so dramatically. He does posess a respectable level of knowledge regarding Technology. But he is just so devoted to proving every last aspect of anything Microsoft

Let's see, in the past few days alone I've advocated Firefox over Internet Explorer and called MS' e-Stamp idea "stupid".

(or Intel) does to be right

My PC has an Athlon 64 in it, and I think Intel is making a mistake by not having their 64-bit PC chip out to compete right now.

and every last thing that Apple

Got me there. Don't think Apple can do much of anything right. Perhaps getting the ball rolling on download stores, though they ****ed theirs up. But it gave the industry momentum.

or Linux does to be wrong

Linux does very few things right. Though the 2.6 kernel is a substantial improvement for both desktop and server.

This causes him to take often very illogical positions in a debate.

Like what?

[Q Classic]

well, since the one who wins would be the master debator, let's set up a poll on deciding the person who manages to troll the best be the master baiter.

[Fake Boris]

Please, Asher, NOT IN THIS THREAD.

[Asher]

It's a rather lame and pointless thread to begin with.

[Fake Boris]

Originally posted by Asher
It's a rather lame and pointless thread to begin with.

Don't add of your own in it then. We know you're good at it, my love.

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Have I won yet?