Is China Preparing for War?

[Saint Marcus]

Doesn't China have the biggest airforce in the world?

Regardless of what planes they fly...shouldn't they at least be able to take out the Taiwanese airforce, by shear numerical superiority alone?

[CerberusIV]

Originally posted by Saint Marcus
Doesn't China have the biggest airforce in the world?

Regardless of what planes they fly...shouldn't they at least be able to take out the Taiwanese airforce, by shear numerical superiority alone?

It doesn't work like that. Israel has always been outnumbered in the air by her arab neighbours but this has never translated into even local air superiority for the arab air forces. The difference in performance of aircraft types between China and Taiwan is of that order, the difference in C&C perhaps a bit less.

Also the Chinese air units have to operate over Taiwan so they use fuel to get there, have to save fuel to get home and come within range of Taiwanese SAM's. All this counts against them.

I don't know how good the Chinese navy is at minehunting but mining is another easy tactic to disrupt an amphibious invasion and I would be surprised if it isn't in the Taiwanese defence plans.

[Patroklos]

It took China 20 years from keel laying to commisioning to build its first nuclear sub, which is crap anyways. The average build time is something like 10 years now, and again produces nothing of quality. They do have some old Russian subs, but again the oldest hulls and hardy the most capable. Basically they are operation a 1960's nuclear sub fleet.

Diesel subs are China's strong point, and they have alot of these. However, their range is very limited and they are suited primarily for defense rolls. Unlike WWII thee subs cannot just recharge their batteries at will during the night. In a blue water situation or operation off a hostile coast the second they try to recharge radar will find them, and they will die.

NATO forces in the Cold War aways relied on their nuc sub capable partners for the GIUK defence while the deasiel subs took the Baltic and Norway coast for this reason.

So no, the Chinese submarine force is in no way underrated. If anything it is overrated.

[PLATO]

Russia Arming Chinese Navy Against U.S.
NewsMax.com
Wednesday, July 12, 2000
Communist China is receiving from Russia the second of four advanced warships armed with super-missiles aimed at knocking out United States aircraft-carrier battle groups.
It is a move unabashedly aimed at countering any U.S. move to honor its pledge to defend Taiwan against China's threatened attack from the mainland.

Republican-led bipartisan members of Congress are so alarmed by this new weapon – which the Navy admits it has little ability to defend against – they are sponsoring legislation to cut off U.S. aid to Russia unless it halts all further sales of "this 200-kiloton nuclear-capable weapon."

Citing its well-placed military-intelligence sources within the Pentagon, the Washington Times is reporting that the second Sovremenny-class advanced warship Beijing is buying from Moscow has been spotted undergoing sea trials in the Gulf of Finland.

What has American observers concerned even more, the exercises are expected to include at least one test launch of the Russian onboard SS-N-22 Sunburn anti-ship cruise missile, which is what makes the Russian vessel so awesome.

Even without the other two installments of the four-ship procurement, this latest acquisition from Russia – which is receiving billions in U.S. aid to bolster its messed-up economy – will give the Communist Chinese People's Liberation Army frightening new capabilities against U.S. aircraft- carrier battle groups.

Operated by a mixed crew of Russian and Chinese sailors, the first cruise-missile ship, delivered from Russia in February, is currently going through test runs off the Chinese coast, within easy range of Taiwan.

Its arrival in the region was followed within weeks by a shipment of two dozen of the dreaded Russian-made SS-N-22 missiles this spring.

Those developments take on greater significance when considered against the background of recent Russia-to-China sales of missile-equipped destroyers, Su-27 aircraft, Kilo-class submarines and satellite navigation systems for missile guidance.

Just recently, Moscow announced it will begin sending to China also the first 10 of 40 advanced Su-30 warplanes.

Those purchases are funded by cash, much of which China has been able to garner from its lopsided favorable balance of trade with the United States.

The Clinton-Gore administration has spent much of this year lobbying Congress to grant China permanent normal trade status, which would boost even more the communist regime's global trading ability.

There is no longer any question that Russia, a direct recipient of massive aid in U.S. tax dollars, is embarked on a deliberate and extensive program to help bring the Chinese war machine up to world-class standards, or that Beijing's ultimate target is the United States.

The Washington Times reports that the leader of concerned congressmen on both sides of the aisle, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., says, "The SS-N-22 is the most dangerous anti-ship missile in the Russian, and now the Chinese, fleet.

"Our Navy admittedly has scant ability to defend against this 200-kiloton nuclear-capable weapon."

According to the wording of Rohrabacher's bill to rein in Russian missile sales by denying further U.S. financial bail-out assistance to Moscow:

"Currently the Russian and Chinese governments are discussing the sale of two additional Sovremenny destroyers.

"The supersonic Moskit [SS-N-22] missile, which can be mounted on a naval or mobile land platform, was designed specifically to destroy American aircraft carriers and other warships equipped with advanced Aegis radar and battle-management systems.

"The United States Navy considers the missile to be extremely difficult to defend against."

As all this was going on, Defense Secretary William S. Cohen flew in to Beijing on Tuesday to hold talks with his Chinese counterpart, Defense Minister Chi Haotian.

Cohen's arrival was greeted by an official Communist Chinese statement repeating its attacks on the Clinton-Gore administration for proposing a national missile-defense system, which so far has flunked most of its in-flight tests.

Calling it part of American plans to dominate the world, the Chinese statement said:

"We urge the United States to drop as soon as possible this plan, which does not serve its interest and harms that of others."

Cohen said earlier that part of the objective of his mission to Beijing was to assure the Chinese government that the limited U.S. missile-defense shield would not pose a threat to China.

Granted this is a nearly four year old article, but it speaks volumes to what the Chinese are trying to accomplish WRT their naval capabilities in the Strait and beyond.

My belief is that the Chinese are very patient but also very determined. In the end I believe it will be war. The frightening fact is that the Chinese will not move until they feel they can win and the US won't move until attacked.

[GePap]

I can believe Newsmax ever paid compliment to a Russian weapon system :shocked:

I don't forsee war with China anytime soon.

[PLATO]

Originally posted by GePap
I can believe Newsmax ever paid compliment to a Russian weapon system :shocked:

I don't forsee war with China anytime soon.

agree on both points. I think the Chinese outlook is long term. I would imagine that war is not their only option for gaining dominance over us eithier.

[CerberusIV]

A local war fought between PRC and Taiwan (with US help) using conventional weapons is just about possible. The bit I noticed in that article was the reference to "200 kiloton warheads". The Chinese may have a few nuclear armed missiles that might get through to hit a US carrier but would the US just sit and take it or would there be a tactical nuclear retaliation? I doubt if the Chinese want every military installation within 500 miles of Taiwan vapourised.

[CharlesBHoff]

China have than armour vehicle that can swim underwater carrying 10-20 infrantryman and equipment built by the 10' thousand's drive up onto a beach undetected an stike key defence system and destory then with cannon fires, captive airfield and destory enemy airforce. Plus China is working on a bore vehicle which can tunnel underground to reach target.

[CharlesBHoff]

Originally posted by Japher


If YOU are, I am sure THEY are

China schmina, they are just feeling all full of themselves because they put a man in space... Just wait until we put a man on Mars!

I doubt that America will put man on Mars. First it will take than 18 month to get there wait between 18 and 24 month for than window to head home, take 18 month to reach home. Problem is carrying than water and food to last the entire trip.

[CharlesBHoff]

Originally posted by GePap
I can believe Newsmax ever paid compliment to a Russian weapon system :shocked:

I don't forsee war with China anytime soon.

The USSR have the t-34 tank one of the best tank of war world 2 and the AK-47 and their ICBM.

[Eli]

Originally posted by CharlesBHoff
China have than armour vehicle that can swim underwater carrying 10-20 infrantryman and equipment built by the 10' thousand's drive up onto a beach undetected an stike key defence system and destory then with cannon fires, captive airfield and destory enemy airforce. Plus China is working on a bore vehicle which can tunnel underground to reach target.

Source?

I doubt that America will put man on Mars. First it will take than 18 month to get there wait between 18 and 24 month for than window to head home, take 18 month to reach home. Problem is carrying than water and food to last the entire trip.

Travel time is 6-7 months in one direction. And that's if we dont use nuclear power.

[PLATO]

Originally posted by Eli


Source?

I would imagine the Encyclopedia of B.S. published by fantasyland press.

[GePap]

Originally posted by PLATO


I would imagine the Encyclopedia of B.S. published by fantasyland press.

Hey, fantasyland press is great! I hear the administration reads all thier products!

NO, but Charles's claims didn't come from fantasyland, they came from LSD Times magazine.

[Mordoch]

Originally posted by CerberusIV
I don't know how good the Chinese navy is at minehunting but mining is another easy tactic to disrupt an amphibious invasion and I would be surprised if it isn't in the Taiwanese defence plans.

The Taiwanese Navy certainly has made minelaying a focus of their Navy. They have aproximately 30 mine warfare ships.

In addition to this the 11 Chinchiang-class vessels can all be equipped with 2 mine racks apiece. (Why the info I have is a bit unclear, I'm assuming it can be quickly modified in this manner depending on the mission.)

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/row/rocn/jing-chiang.htm

Given the limited number of usable beaches for an invading fleet attacking Taiwan, the Taiwanese Navy should be able to predict what areas the Chinese Navy will have to travel across, and lay their mines accordingly. Even a delay to clear a path through the minefield is going to be a major problem for the Chinese Navy, since its more time that their transports are potentially vulnerable to navy and air attack before they can even land their troops. If the minefields are laid close to Taiwan, the ships defusing the mines will be vulnerable to both naval attacks as well as air attacks that have the advantage of being launched from a very close range.

[:) Smiley]

t-34 tank one of the best tank of war world 2

...