Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can't wait to hear the screams about the ACLU on this one...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Can't wait to hear the screams about the ACLU on this one...

    The evil liberal organization is at it again:

    The latest news and headlines from Yahoo News. Get breaking news stories and in-depth coverage with videos and photos.


    ACLU Backs Rush Limbaugh's Privacy
    Mon Jan 12, 1:01 PM ET

    By JILL BARTON, Associated Press Writer

    WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. - Rush Limbaugh and the American Civil Liberties Union (news - web sites) don't agree about much, but they're in accord that the conservative radio commentator's medical records should be off-limits to prosecutors.

    The Florida ACLU filed court papers Monday supporting Limbaugh's argument that investigators violated his constitutional right to privacy when they seized his medical records in November to investigate whether he violated drug laws when he purchased prescription painkillers.

    "It may seem odd that the ACLU has come to the defense of Rush Limbaugh," the state chapter's executive director, Howard Simon, said in a statement. "But we have always said that the ACLU's real client is the Bill of Rights and we will continue to safeguard the values of equality, fairness and privacy for everyone, regardless of race, economic status or political point of view."

    State Attorney Barry Krischer had no comment on the ACLU's involvement. Spokesman Mike Edmondson said prosecutors have followed state laws and have protected Limbaugh's rights throughout the investigation. Limbaugh has not been charged with a crime.

    Prosecutors say they cannot continue their investigation until they review Limbaugh's medical records, which have been sealed since Dec. 23.

    Limbaugh's attorneys have asked an appeals court to keep the records sealed past a Jan. 23 deadline set by the Palm Beach Circuit Court.

    Investigators went after the records discovering that Limbaugh received more than 2,000 painkillers, prescribed by four doctors in six months, at a pharmacy near his Palm Beach mansion. Limbaugh's former maid told investigators she had been supplying him prescription painkillers for years.

    Limbaugh argues that the investigation is politically motivated — a charge that prosecutors deny. His attorney Roy Black says the records would only prove Limbaugh suffered from a serious medical condition and was prescribed painkillers.

    Limbaugh admitted his addiction in October, saying it stemmed from severe back pain. He took a five-week leave from his afternoon radio show to enter a rehabilitation program.
    Those liberal swine!
    Tutto nel mondo è burla

  • #2
    What justification was given for seizure of medical records? Is there any precedent for this?
    12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
    Stadtluft Macht Frei
    Killing it is the new killing it
    Ultima Ratio Regum

    Comment


    • #3
      Also, I can see that incases of fraud etc. there needs to be the ability to look at a patient's medical records, but I'm very hesitant to agree with this...
      12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
      Stadtluft Macht Frei
      Killing it is the new killing it
      Ultima Ratio Regum

      Comment


      • #4
        Burn down ACLU headquarters!
        http://monkspider.blogspot.com/

        Comment


        • #5
          Rush Limbaugh must be a terrorist! Why else would the terrorcommie ACLU defend them?
          "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
          -Bokonon

          Comment


          • #6
            Remember that buying drugs makes you a terrorist...
            12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
            Stadtluft Macht Frei
            Killing it is the new killing it
            Ultima Ratio Regum

            Comment


            • #7
              No clue what the justification is, but between Limbaugh and the ACLU, only one of them has had a consistent position on this matter, and it ain't Limbaugh. His concern for privacy seems to only come into play when his ass is on the line:

              "I agree with the view, best articulated by Judge Robert Bork, that there is no basis in the Constitution for the privacy right which was announced as the foundational basis for the constitutional right to abortion. " - The Way Things Ought To Be, p. 56 Jul 2, 1992
              Tutto nel mondo è burla

              Comment


              • #8
                they have to defend privacy rights, if he loses, they are gone.

                see that in the article "constitutional right to privacy", it doesn't say that anywhere in there, and if the judges decide Rush doesn't have one, then they don't exist. I'm sure you all understand the implications of that.

                Comment


                • #9
                  But we have always said that the ACLU's real client is the Bill of Rights
                  BS!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    "I agree with the view, best articulated by Judge Robert Bork, that there is no basis in the Constitution for the privacy right which was announced as the foundational basis for the constitutional right to abortion. " - The Way Things Ought To Be, p. 56 Jul 2, 1992
                    Abortion involves at least 2 people...the victim and the
                    aborter(s). Therefore it is no longer a matter of privacy... But that aside, perhaps Bork and Limbaugh can explain the basis for the 4th Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and siezures if there is no right to privacy. And when they're done with that, perhaps they can explain why the absence of an enumerated right translates into a government power. The Constitution is a grant of enumerated powers, not a blank check to do anything not explicitly prohibited. Furthermore, the Limbaugh case involves the Florida Constitution which I hear does have a privacy clause.

                    Comment


                    • #11


                      Bork does not support your position, Boris.

                      Bork does not rule out a right to privacy, but rather, rules out the question that the existing right to privacy encompasses abortion.

                      Thus Limbaugh is not contradicting himself here.
                      Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                      "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                      2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
                        Thus Limbaugh is not contradicting himself here.
                        Yes he is, as he was indeed saying there is no constitutional right to privacy, and reiterated this point of you not in reference to abortion:

                        On his radio program on June 27, 2003, Rush Limbaugh is quoted as saying::

                        "There is no right to privacy specifically enumerated in the Constitution."

                        Which is, of course, correct. Thankfully our rights don't derive from the Constitution. But he was using this not for abortion, to support the government being able to tell adults who they can and can't have sex with. So his interest in privacy indeed only extends as far as his own interests.
                        Tutto nel mondo è burla

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Yes he is. Please reread.

                          He argues against any Constitutional right to privacy.
                          12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                          Stadtluft Macht Frei
                          Killing it is the new killing it
                          Ultima Ratio Regum

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Ben -
                            best articulated by Judge Robert Bork, that there is no basis in the Constitution for the privacy right
                            Sounds like he's ruling out a right to privacy. The fact this alleged right was declared as the basis for a right to abortion is another matter... he's denying there's any right of privacy. I wonder what Limbaugh has to say about Bork claiming there is no right to keep and bear arms in the Constitution.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              If Berzerker and I agree on something then it must be right.

                              That and the world's about to end.
                              12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                              Stadtluft Macht Frei
                              Killing it is the new killing it
                              Ultima Ratio Regum

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X