Death to France!

[Pax]

Originally posted by CharlesBHoff


Most Arab states are multi cultural and tolerant, they just donot like western with they attitude telling than what to do. When Ike was president the King of Saudi Arabia has than America Citz whip 50 times for manufactoring in Saudi Arabia alcohol for himself to drink. He was warming afew time by the Saudi government to not do so, he was warm by the America goverment to not do so as it is against Saudi Law which carry the death sentence. When he went to America government to complaint about how he was treated, he got no symathic from our Independence government back them not the Israel control vassal state we became. So you believe that Saudi Arabia was intolerant
for enforcement they laws. Now our Israel control puppet government would act entire different today we would be telling Saudi Arabia to not enforce they intolerant laws.

I did not mean that being a tolerant state means doing what the U.S. tells you too. I meant that most religous states are intolerant of differing religions. Just as most religous people are intolerant of other peoples religion. This is strictly my opinion and it comes from looking at the news. Clan rallies, antigay rallies, Catholic/Protest Ireland, Concentration camps for Jews, Japanese, Africans anyone that comes from a different culture. France in its present condition is intolerant. I apologize to any person who thinks that I am in support of Imperialism, Colonialism, or any projection of external power on foreign soil for anything other than actual self defense, which the war in Iraq is not. I believe that I agree or believe you on everything you said. I also firmly believe that every country should be responsible fro their own laws and not have to be told by the U.S. what their policies should be. I do believe that there should be some method for countries being accountable for human rights violations, political oppression, and etc. Maybe the U.N. or something. In present form the U.N. does not work for several reasons.

[Aqualung71]

Re: Death to France!

Interesting article.

I wonder why the Iranians weren't chanting "death to Singapore" last year when head scarves were banned from schools.

Do we have a discriminatory response to discrimination here?

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by JimmyCracksCorn
But people need to categorize

But it does assert something that cannot be proven. An article of faith, perhaps?

[Aqualung71]

Oh no, I've just noticed CharlesBHoff in this thread. Time to throw rational thought and readability out the window.

[Mazarin]

Originally posted by Thriller
Oh no, I've just noticed CharlesBHoff in this thread. Time to throw rational thought and readability out the window.

but the chick he keeps on posting is really hot

[CharlesBHoff]

Originally posted by Pax Africanus


I did not mean that being a tolerant state means doing what the U.S. tells you too. I meant that most religous states are intolerant of differing religions. Just as most religous people are intolerant of other peoples religion. This is strictly my opinion and it comes from looking at the news. Clan rallies, antigay rallies, Catholic/Protest Ireland, Concentration camps for Jews, Japanese, Africans anyone that comes from a different culture. France in its present condition is intolerant. I apologize to any person who thinks that I am in support of Imperialism, Colonialism, or any projection of external power on foreign soil for anything other than actual self defense, which the war in Iraq is not. I believe that I agree or believe you on everything you said. I also firmly believe that every country should be responsible fro their own laws and not have to be told by the U.S. what their policies should be. I do believe that there should be some method for countries being accountable for human rights violations, political oppression, and etc. Maybe the U.N. or something. In present form the U.N. does not work for several reasons.

The local Shief is than Christian Fundie but he doesnot like the idear of religious conflict in his area. Muslim woman arenot the only one who wear headscarf, alot of hindic woman wear headscarf, there is few jewish sect where woman wear headscarf, some middleeastern christian church woman wear headscarf. The reason this was found out some parent ask what they son was doing and some told they parent and they parent read the leaflet and called the local shielf who called the DA an they got than emergry court order against the minister against hand out any more leaflet of this type.
This type of court order is legal as there is no free speech protection on urginry people to do criminal acts.
The elders of that church remove the minister from his post. Middleeastern woman who come to america are under the protection of the Roman Cath, Greek Oth, and some mainline Prot church thought agreement with they churches in the middleeast. They attend church service but allow to wear the headscarf an other custum of they church. Plus it woman who wear headscarf where rape what would stop other religious group from rapeing Christian fundie woman too. This happen like after 9-11 an it was nipped in the bud.

[Aqualung71]

Ah yes, maybe he's got the hots for Ms Bhutto!

[CharlesBHoff]

Originally posted by Thriller
Ah yes, maybe he's got the hots for Ms Bhutto!

Not really. I treat her like my sister. She cause look better than some other women in political area. The woman who will become the next Canada PM look like a dog.

[notyoueither]

You are one of a kind, Charles. Thankfully.

[Ben Kenobi]

The woman who will become the next Canada PM look like a dog.

Hey. That's Ms. Dog to you.

[Aqualung71]

I just realised Charles has a sense of humour. Good on ya mate!

[Ned]

Well being Canadian, she can't be a "hot" dog.