Originally posted by GePap
What stick? Anyone here seriously think the US and UK would have the capacity, within the next year, to do an "iraq" agaisnt Lybia?
And why offer carrots if Lybia is so obviously in the wrong? I thought the Bu****es don't negotiate with terrorists?
What stick? Anyone here seriously think the US and UK would have the capacity, within the next year, to do an "iraq" agaisnt Lybia?
And why offer carrots if Lybia is so obviously in the wrong? I thought the Bu****es don't negotiate with terrorists?
1. Q: What stick - A: obviously Khaddafi is smart enough to negotiate now, rather than wait till US forces are available and he loses leverage - in general if your long term position is one in decline, its best to negotiate early (that is, as a matter of fact, one of the arguments made by moderate doves in Israel against the Sharon approach)
2. Q: Bush dont negotiate with terrorists - A:He was treating Qaddafi not as a terrorist, but as a leader of a state with WMD - which we WILL negotiate with, and are doing so now in N Korea. Now wrt to Nkor theres some dispute about how much of a carrot its appropriate to give them, but i think all are agreed SOME carrot is appropriate. WRT to Qaddafis support for terrorists, he turned over the agents behind lockerbie, and has distanced himself from terrorism for some years. Its certainly possible for states to take actions that remove themselves from the supporters of terrorism list
3. Why Libya and not Syria? Well Gepap is correct that previous Libyan actions had SOMETHING to do with this, its also arguable that Syria is far less vulnerable to US the US stick than Libya is, for reasons of geography and demographics, and internal politics. In any case, its too early to state that Libya is the last fruit of the Iraq intervention. IN fact Baby Assad has been making noises about reopening negotiations with Israel, so in fact Syria may be thinking along lines of rapprochement as well.
Comment