This is what George Bush Senior said in his memoirs, A World Transformed, 5 years ago about why he didn't authorise an invasion of Iraq:
Trying to eliminate Saddam... would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible...We would have been forced to occuppy Baghdad...there was no viable "exit strategy" we could see, violating another of our principles.
Furthermore, we had been self-consciously trying to set a pattern of handling aggression in the post-Cold War world. Going in and occuppying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the United Nations mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, The United States could still conceivably be an occuppying power in a bitterly hostile land.
Gee, that sounds like the situation in Iraq right now.
Trying to eliminate Saddam... would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible...We would have been forced to occuppy Baghdad...there was no viable "exit strategy" we could see, violating another of our principles.
Furthermore, we had been self-consciously trying to set a pattern of handling aggression in the post-Cold War world. Going in and occuppying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the United Nations mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, The United States could still conceivably be an occuppying power in a bitterly hostile land.
Gee, that sounds like the situation in Iraq right now.
Comment