How would you vote on the Canadian Alliance motion?

[FrustratedPoet]

Sorry Q, that wasn't aimed at you. I actually agree with everything you said in that post.

The smilies were meant to sum up this thread. Trying to make the ignorant see enlightenment is like bashing your head against a wall.

[ricketyclik]

Originally posted by Ben Kenobi

Thirdly, we have a low birthrate. This will drop the birthrate further.

So, Ben, if this law is passed, you are going to cease heterosexual intercourse and become gay? I think this applies to a lot of homophobes.

[ricketyclik]

Originally posted by Ben Kenobi


Asher:

Actually, I used to agree with you. However your argument assumes that all a homosexual can expect to have is a homosexual relationship.

Now, we both know that's not true.

The evidence is stacking up

[St Leo]

Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
First, Why 'to the exclusion of all others?' If we approve of homosexual marriages, why not polygamy?

Polygamy would be a bit harder to implement. The easiest approach for legalizing polygamy would be to allow multiple concurrent marriages for any one person with any random one of those going on the income tax form.

Meh. No one seems to want it badly, so there's no reason to bother.

Secondly, Not helpful to the churches who oppose gay marriage. They will likely have tax exemptions cut off if they refuse to marry a couple. We see this in the Marc Hall case, and I see further precedents down the line.

Whatever. I personally have no particular desire to actually encourage people to marry in churches, whatever their sexual orientation.

Thirdly, we have a low birthrate. This will drop the birthrate further.

I guess research in test tube babies needs more investment then.

We might also want to lift the ban on surrogate mothers. That one hit me by surprise.

Fourth, immigration from other countries of people who cannot get married in their home countries, coming to Canada just to get married.

Haven't you ever heard of the ideas of "gateway drugs" and/or "tourism"? There's no need to actually emigrate somewhere to get a marriage ceremony and, if they do, it doesn't really matter what gets them addicted to Canada.

Fifth, what's going to happen with families? An affirmation of marriage between a man and a woman would finally show that a traditional family is something to be valued.

Eh? Are you following the the-unwashed-masses-aren't-paying-any-attention-to-me,-but-surely-they'll-care-what-a-bunch-of-fuddy-duddy-old-farts-on-Parliament-Hill-think train of thought?

[Ben Kenobi]

Are you Boddington's DL?

Homophobes who claim they value family, have this narrow, constrictive view of what a family entails, so as to exclude homosexuals.

They do not want to acknowledge the fact that many homosexuals do value family.

And homosexuals have narrow views of all those who disagree with them as homophobes. Why don't we get into the nitty-gritty facts that both sides have different views of what a family consists of, rather than assuming the homosexual position as more 'open'?

[Ben Kenobi]

Krazyhorse:

Ask yourself: If I ask 100 people in their twenties if they are regular internet users and then ask 100 people in their 70s the same question, will I get the same answer? Why not?

So there were no homosexuals 70 years ago, just as there were no internet users 70 years ago?

Interesting.

[Ben Kenobi]

ricketyclick:

So, Ben, if this law is passed, you are going to cease heterosexual intercourse and become gay? I think this applies to a lot of homophobes.

That all the homophobes will switch? I think you need to rethink your position.

I'm more concerned about the children.

Secondly, how will this ruling improve the birthrate? For each union, everyone else would have to have at least 4 children, just to keep the population even.

The evidence is stacking up

You calling my bluff?

I'm happy to provide testimonies from people who have left the gay lifestyle if people will accept the testimonies as evidence.

[chequita guevara]

Either everyone who wants to get married should be allowed to get married or no one should have their marriage recognized by the state.

BTW, the USSR was the first country to recognize gay marriage in modern times, though that changed under Uncle Joe.

[Ben Kenobi]

What about incest, or polygamy, Che?

Should we marry people just because they demand to be married, regardless of previous commitments?

[Ben Kenobi]

marriage is a sacred and holy bond. it was once, and always has been between a man and a woman. but times change, and unless straight people can once again show that marriage is what they say it is, then they really have no business being so hypocritical.

Qcubed:

I agree wholeheartedly.

The increase in the divorce rate, is not independent from these further demands. Marriage has been weakened for some time so why not change the definition all together?

[Ben Kenobi]

St. Leo:

I guess research in test tube babies needs more investment then.

We might also want to lift the ban on surrogate mothers. That one hit me by surprise.

Eh, your jabs miss the mark. I'm not Catholic yet, and I support both of these causes, provided adequate safeguards are imposed to prevent abuses.

Are you following the the-unwashed-masses-aren't-paying-any-attention-to-me,-but-surely-they'll-care-what-a-bunch-of-fuddy-duddy-old-farts-on-Parliament-Hill-think train of thought?

Parody demands real skill, which I fear you lack.

[MrFun]

Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
What about incest, or polygamy, Che?

Should we marry people just because they demand to be married, regardless of previous commitments?

I believe that sexual orienation is not a strong indicator on how committed-inclined a man/woman can be.

Rather, it's the societal environment, and a person's individual values that will determine how well they can commit.



Who are you to judge, and say whether an entire group of diverse individuals cannot commit?

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
What about incest, or polygamy, Che?

Should we marry people just because they demand to be married, regardless of previous commitments?

While adult incest makes me uncomfortable, I can't see any good legal reason for it to be outlawed, aside from a slight increase in the possibility birth defects if they have children.

Polygamy is legal in many parts of the world, at least bigmany is. If a Moslem with four wives moved to Canada, should he be forced to divorce three of them?

[Lincoln]

Originally posted by Ben Kenobi

I'm happy to provide testimonies from people who have left the gay lifestyle if people will accept the testimonies as evidence.

We only accept testamonies from people who have come out of the closet. The others are simply homophobic, right wing, nut cases.

[Jon Miller]

homosexuals are known to have commitment problems

it remains to be seen if that is just because society does not support them the way it does heterosexual couples, though (with marriage and other such things)

Jon Miller