Society doesn't "owe" me anything....at least not any society that I want to live in.
Yes, the poor should pay taxes. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. If we're going to have taxes (and we are....sorry DF), then everybody gets to play the game.
Obviously those who have more will pay more. That makes a certain inescapable logical sense (and is the corrnerstone of a "progressive" tax system), but everybody who wants to be a part OF the society should pull their weight, whatever that might be.
This rich-poor argument: Tripe and nonsense. People are NOT equal. And because they are not equal, there WILL BE differences in outcomes, and that's okay. There are some folks who will argue the other side who are (for whatever bizzare reason) utterly convinced that society should pay everyone a wage for being alive, or for being a really nice, cool guy. These people are also convinced that economic worth = self worth.
I'm not buying that either. Economics is a game, and should be treated as such. Some of the wealth generated by the game should be used to create a social safety net (stronger than the one we have now in this country) to help those who: a) aren't very good at the game, b) can't play the game, or c) don't know how, but want to learn to play the game. Note that this social safety net should NOT pay people in perpetuity for being alive, nor should it be simply doled out....it should be structured to promote people to play the game. If you choose NOT to play the game, that's your choice, but then don't whine that the system isn't being fair to you. If you don't want to play the game, have a plan in mind to provide for yourself without doing it. Otherwise, suck it up and play ball.
-=Vel=-
Yes, the poor should pay taxes. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. If we're going to have taxes (and we are....sorry DF), then everybody gets to play the game.
Obviously those who have more will pay more. That makes a certain inescapable logical sense (and is the corrnerstone of a "progressive" tax system), but everybody who wants to be a part OF the society should pull their weight, whatever that might be.
This rich-poor argument: Tripe and nonsense. People are NOT equal. And because they are not equal, there WILL BE differences in outcomes, and that's okay. There are some folks who will argue the other side who are (for whatever bizzare reason) utterly convinced that society should pay everyone a wage for being alive, or for being a really nice, cool guy. These people are also convinced that economic worth = self worth.
I'm not buying that either. Economics is a game, and should be treated as such. Some of the wealth generated by the game should be used to create a social safety net (stronger than the one we have now in this country) to help those who: a) aren't very good at the game, b) can't play the game, or c) don't know how, but want to learn to play the game. Note that this social safety net should NOT pay people in perpetuity for being alive, nor should it be simply doled out....it should be structured to promote people to play the game. If you choose NOT to play the game, that's your choice, but then don't whine that the system isn't being fair to you. If you don't want to play the game, have a plan in mind to provide for yourself without doing it. Otherwise, suck it up and play ball.
-=Vel=-
Comment