Originally posted by Tuberski
But, if that policy isn't applied across the board, then it is a useless policy.
In boris's example:
1.Sexually descrimination is okay. They work for a company that does this.
2. A product that simulates violence and illegal activity, is the reason they don't take the Take Two account.
Seems stupid to me.
ACK!
But, if that policy isn't applied across the board, then it is a useless policy.
In boris's example:
1.Sexually descrimination is okay. They work for a company that does this.
2. A product that simulates violence and illegal activity, is the reason they don't take the Take Two account.
Seems stupid to me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa532/aa532b4a3b739c15da077ff1832822524bf684d9" alt="Stick Out Tongue"
Real world malfeasance vs. simulated violence in a computer game. The later is somehow worse?
Comment