Heterophobia

[MRT144]

i still cant believe you think im all pro gay cheerleader...i dont get it

[Solly]

Every liberal is. They'd love everyone to be cottaging.

[MrFun]

Originally posted by Worthingtons
Didnt I just say you had got better on this respect Mr Fun? Meaning that you were contributing towards non-sexuality related threads.

I know -- I was just reinforcing what you stated.

[MRT144]

id do you in the butt bods

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by MRT144
id do you in the butt bods

So not only are you a flamboyant gay cheerleader, but you also have incredibly low standards as well!

[MRT144]

id do it just so he wouldnt be able to live with himself.

[Boris Godunov]

If you must, but I'd suggest triple-wrapping it. I mean, ugh.

[MRT144]

i was thinking cast iron with a smiley face on the tip.

like this

[Novaya Havoc]

Woo... gay marriage.

I have been engaged for 8 months to my fiancee, and we are planning to go to Vermont (the only US state that allows "civil unions") in the fall to finalize the deal.

But, since the USA passed the "DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT" in 1996, gay unions of any sort are outlawed in each state, unless a state allows them to be legitimate.

So if I get married in Vermont, it is illegal in Michigan, my home resident state, or Illinois, where the two of us currently live.

Of course, if my sister married her boyfriend in Vermont, it would be a legal contract in _any_ state.

And they say Federalism is the best form of government.

Recently, my home county passed legislation giving same-sex couples work benefits, such as sharing medical plans and the like. Conservative lobbies argued that it was unfair to heterosexuals, since "unmarried heterosexuals" did not receive the benefits that "unmarried homosexuals" do.

All of this is a sickening, Catch-22 approach to politics, and -- unfortunately -- the same illogical arguments are being used overseas (and across the border in Canada). Feh. The poor heterosexuals; oh the humanity!

Ah well. One day I will have my own family; Jason and I want to adopt children. We still hope that one day we could have made a baby of our own; recent cloning reasearch has theorized that male eggs or female sperm can be made by extracting the DNA from an egg and placing the DNA of a sperm into it, and vice versa, allowing for children that are the biological product of two men or two women.

Again, with American conservatism on the rise, "cloning reasearch" (since common propaganda is deceptive into thinking any cloning research means making full human clones) is getting the sqeeze, along with most other civil liberties.

To what degree of buffoonery will those with power resort in order to keep their status?

It's just silly.

-Ben

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by Novaya Havoc
But, since the USA passed the "DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT" in 1996, gay unions of any sort are outlawed in each state, unless a state allows them to be legitimate.

That's on the books? I thought it was defeated. File a suit under the full faith and credit clause if it bothers you.

[Cruddy]

Originally posted by Novaya Havoc
...
To what degree of buffoonery will those with power resort in order to keep their status?

Now there's a rhetorical question if ever I saw one.

[Novaya Havoc]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
That's on the books? I thought it was defeated. File a suit under the full faith and credit clause if it bothers you.

Yes, I am aware that the act violates the FF&C clause of the Constitution, but there is some loophole that was found to allow it to continue. I have forgotten what it was.

I'll have to reference that information again...

-Ben

[Vince278]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
People if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, & quacks like a duck: what is it?

AFLAC!

[Solly]

"The poor heterosexuals; oh the humanity!"



The majority of a country is now deemed to be living in sin by a group the Bible despises?

[Provost Harrison]

I tell you what Stew, there is red carpet and a party waiting for when you mince your way out of the closet