Press has been lying about Iraq

[notyoueither]

It is kind of hard to believe that every reporter, and every news organization has been in on the conspiracy until this brave soul came along.

[Nubclear]

Ok, I know that even Shi and Sloww would simply dismiss this story. But Ned, if you actually believe that EVERY SINGLE REPORTER whos in Iraq is lying, and that its some BIG HUGE conspiracy to ruin Americas image (Surprisingly even from the American government), and this SOLE REPORTER is correct...........

I hardly ever say this to anyone (not even Fez), but if you believe this: Your one of the most STUPID people to ever walk this Earth.

I mean, this is just a HUGE insult to rational thought But thats not exactly what your known for, is it ned?



Edit: See, even NYE is dismissing this.........

[Dis]

and you guys are saying the looting was a bad thing.

you would think left wing socialists of all people would support this.

redistribution of wealth to the poor is a good thing.

sometimes I can't explain what is wrong with left-wingers. All that matters to them is making the Bush administration look bad. They can't realize the fact that Iraqi citizens are better off with all the riches of the Saddam regime.

[LoneWolf]

Originally posted by LoneWolf
Oddly, people like Gepap are quite ready to believe in "right-wing, pro -American" conspiracies. Hmm...

Or tass.

[Nubclear]

Originally posted by LoneWolf


Or tass.

I will admit that some news agencies are biased (Guardin left, Fox right), but to think that EVERY NEWS AGENCY is conspiring WITH EACH OTHER and WITH THE IRAQI PEOPLE to do this.........

Dont tell me you believe it, LoneWolf?

[HershOstropoler]

Re: Press has been lying about Iraq

Originally posted by Ned
There is no mass looting -- it always was directed. The reports on the looting of the Museum were lies from the very beginning. The people are genuinely happy to have the Americans present and Saddam gone.

Damn. The CIA has managed to reprogram Al Sahaf.

[LoneWolf]

Not saying I do.

But what reaction would a story that, for example, FOX News was conspiring with the other news agencies to make the war look better than it was, get from the likes of you? Just as a for instance.

Would you not say "See, see, this is what I've been saying"?

[Nubclear]

Originally posted by LoneWolf
Not saying I do.

But your not saying that you dont, either. So respond to the question with one of the FOLLOWING answers. Do not use any other answers or else it will be considered and accepted that you are attempting to avoid the question:

1. I believe that all the news agencies of the world are co-operating to make the war look worse that it is.
2. I do not believe that all the news agencies of the world are co-operating to make the war look worse than it is.

But what reaction would a story that, for example, FOX News was conspiring with the other news agencies to make the war look better than it was, get from the likes of you? Just as a for instance.

I know Fox is trying to make the war look better than it is, but I doubt their actually conspiring with other news agencies Much less ALL the news agencies in the world

[HershOstropoler]

Originally posted by LoneWolf

But what reaction would a story that, for example, FOX News was conspiring with the other news agencies to make the war look better than it was, get from the likes of you?

That would be like a professional stripper conspiring to take her cloths off.

[LoneWolf]

I will not be told what I can or cannot respond to.

With all due respect (as limited as such respect is due), you have not responded to me.

If someone comes to this Board with a loony anti-American conspiracy theory, you will be the first to jump onboard.

[Nubclear]

Originally posted by LoneWolf
I will not be told what I can or cannot respond to.

Pulling an Enron on us, Lonewolf? Go ahead and take the fifth.......Because your already speaking MUCH louder than words will allow

With all due respect (as limited as such respect is due), you have not responded to me.

The question I saw is: "Do you believe Fox is conspiring with other networks to make the war look better than it is?" and I responded "While i think while Fox is trying to make the war look better, NO I do not believe they are conspiring with other news agencies."

Please rephrase and restate your question. I must have missed it

If someone comes to this Board with a loony anti-American conspiracy theory, you will be the first to jump onboard.

And you will subscribe to a pro-american anti-everyonelse conspiracy theory, as apparent in this thread.

I recommend you pull out. Your losing very badly right now.

[MRT144]

the thing makes me laugh is that ned chooses to believe one reporter over EVERYONE ELSE simply because that reporter says what ned wants to believe.

[LoneWolf]

Boy, you sure do like similes, don't you.
Ok, since you don't seem to be able to understand anything not stated in short sound bites, I will try to cut some more complex ideas into small, easily digestible pieces for you:
-No, the looting was a quite apparent fact.
-Yes, I think the idea of an "informal" conspiracy of the press is quite posible.
-Yes, I think that you and your ilk are much more likely to believe in such a conspiracy of the right rahter than the left, even though the left is demonstrably more dominant in the media, even the American media.
Are these small enough bites for you, or do I need to chew them even more?

[Pekka]

mrt144, what's your take on this, you're the expert on looting?

[MRT144]

I think that neds out of his ****ing gord. obviously it was looted by Fox News and other right wing media sources.