I just saw this on Scarborough report on MSNBC: Jonathan Forman (I believe this is his name) an embedded reporter from the NY Post, has broken the news that the press has giving a totally distorted view of what is going on in Baghdad. There is no mass looting -- it always was directed. The reports on the looting of the Museum were lies from the very beginning. The people are genuinely happy to have the Americans present and Saddam gone.
Asked why he broke the story, he said that he had the discrepancy between what was being reported and what was happening was too great for him to keep silent about it.
In his story, he cites names and reports and shows how the reporters lied to slant the stories to be anti-American.
He says that virutally all the biased reporting is coming from reporters who were in Baghdad during the war, and not from embedded reporters. The AP and USA Today are the most biased, he reported.
I looked for a link, but could not find anything on the NY Post's site.
Asked why he broke the story, he said that he had the discrepancy between what was being reported and what was happening was too great for him to keep silent about it.
In his story, he cites names and reports and shows how the reporters lied to slant the stories to be anti-American.
He says that virutally all the biased reporting is coming from reporters who were in Baghdad during the war, and not from embedded reporters. The AP and USA Today are the most biased, he reported.
I looked for a link, but could not find anything on the NY Post's site.
Comment