I'll try.
I think what I was thinking (though it may have come out sort of strange) is that you don't need to have 1 billion+ population superpowers side by side. I think it's a lot more interesting (and plausible) to have a mixture of large and small countries.
Think about the power gap (if you could call it that) between North and Central America. Or of Switzerland sandwiched between the bickering tribes of Europe.
(Yeah, I suppose the obvious answer is that I could go play an NES. )
Edit: As an aside, why do we demand plausibility in everything except the population numbers? I don't argue that we shouldn't demand plausibility in weapons and economics. I do argue that no-one bats an eyelid when I mention that Karakas' population is equivalent to that of the Earth circa 1950, just because it says so on Jennifer Government.
I think what I was thinking (though it may have come out sort of strange) is that you don't need to have 1 billion+ population superpowers side by side. I think it's a lot more interesting (and plausible) to have a mixture of large and small countries.
Think about the power gap (if you could call it that) between North and Central America. Or of Switzerland sandwiched between the bickering tribes of Europe.
(Yeah, I suppose the obvious answer is that I could go play an NES. )
Edit: As an aside, why do we demand plausibility in everything except the population numbers? I don't argue that we shouldn't demand plausibility in weapons and economics. I do argue that no-one bats an eyelid when I mention that Karakas' population is equivalent to that of the Earth circa 1950, just because it says so on Jennifer Government.
Comment