Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turn 112, 330 BC

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Stats:

    Inside Inchon: cat, healthy elite pike, injured (2HP) vet pike. Oh, and no leaders
    Outside Inchon: 3: 2 units, 9 & 6: max pips (8 or more units on each tile).
    "Close your eyes, for your eyes will only tell the truth,
    And the truth isn't what you want to see,
    Close your eyes, and let music set you free..."
    - Phantom of the Opera

    Comment


    • #17
      Presumably, the injured vet is one we unloaded last turn, while the elite is one that was already fortified. We'll probably need to pull back the force we landed outside Elipolis to defend Inchon, but we'll know more when we get into the turn proper. By the way, are our walls still up?

      Also, I'm inclined to switch Hurricane to a pike this turn since we just lost six of the things.

      Comment


      • #18
        Walls: yes.
        "Close your eyes, for your eyes will only tell the truth,
        And the truth isn't what you want to see,
        Close your eyes, and let music set you free..."
        - Phantom of the Opera

        Comment


        • #19
          Yeah, agreed, Nathan. Switch Hurricane to a pike. Damnit.

          Can we rush a unit in Inchon?

          Damnit!

          -Arrian
          grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

          The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

          Comment


          • #20
            Can we rush a unit in Inchon?

            We have no shields, but rushing a worker first, then switching to a pike and rushing (same turn)would could us 160 G instaeds of 240G
            Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
            Then why call him God? - Epicurus

            Comment


            • #21
              MOFO!!!!

              I never thought of that!

              Edit: So never, EVER rush from 0 anything but a Worker. I obviously usually don;t rush from scratch anyway, but I've usually seeded by disbanding. Is it just me, or is this a new trick?
              The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.

              Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.

              Comment


              • #22
                Never thought of what? Using a worker to short rush?

                Really? I do that all the time in SP.

                -Arrian
                grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Well how come you never told me??!!
                  The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.

                  Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I never do any of these tactics in SP (shortrushing either), but I guess there fare game in MP.
                    -

                    Don't really know if you do this Nathan, but when going through the production fase, do you switch workers to benefit shields again?
                    IE using top tiles (shielded cow/forest game etc.) for more then one city.
                    It's not always possible, since you can only go to the next city in line (the previous ones will have gotten their shield production calculated already)
                    Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
                    Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Isn't that an exploit?
                      The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.

                      Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Negative, ghostrider, the pattern is full.

                        Sorry, wierd Top Gun quote I always use for no reason.

                        Anyway, no, I don't believe it's an exploit at all.

                        -Arrian
                        grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                        The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I ask you, is short-rushing an exploit?

                          There are all borderline to me, but unlike the AI, others can learn and use these themselves.
                          Can't really answer your question I'm affraid

                          That's why I said, I never use any of these in SP games.
                          Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
                          Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I have the save open now.

                            Regarding whether or not to rush a pike, (presumably using the short-rush trick), as much as I hate to do it, I think we probably should. Vox still has their cats, and our walls are down, meaning that Vox has a good shot at pinging a pike or two. And based on last turn's Voxian deployments, they could easily have a fresh veteran and three fresh regular immortals in position to strike. In addition, some immortals from last turn may have avoided injury, especially attacking injured pikes. A rushed pike this turn would give us a second healthy fortified pike and two healthy unfortified ones (assuming we pull back the forces we'd hoped to use in a deep strike) before Vox starts getting shots at MedInfs.

                            On the other hand, if we unload galleys in the city, we can get a couple cat shots and maybe ping one regular immortal and then take out a second with a MedInf. We can also unload in Inchoff, cross the mountain to take out a regular pike Vox has sitting on the road, and then, next turn, hit Vox from behind with whatever is left of our five vet MedInfs in that landing. (And hit them with MedInfs and WCs from Inchon as well.) So Vox could soon find the tide turned very much against them.
                            Last edited by nbarclay; June 13, 2003, 20:07.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Let's rush the pike.

                              We can't be too careful.

                              The Random Number God was angry with us this past turn. Though I hope IT will be kinder next turn, I'm not counting on it.

                              It never rains but it pours.

                              -Arrian
                              grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                              The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Note: what I said above depends on whether we consider using a worker to short-rush something else as legitimate or not.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X