Tweet
complete threadjack
And the Argentinians bite the dust.
And the Argentinians bite the dust.
-
-
Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
"Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ BraindeadComment
-
Re: complete threadjack
Oh yeahOriginally posted by DrSpike
And the Argentinians bite the dust.
Comment
-
where is ming with his banning stick when we need him
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits
Hydey the no-limits man.
Comment
-
Why... are you asking to be banned?Originally posted by Hydey
where is ming with his banning stick when we need him
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey, Baron O and SlowwhandComment
-
Ban Hydey! Ban Hydey! Ban Hydey!
Gooooooooooo MING!
Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
"Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ BraindeadComment
-
Yeah he is a bit of a spammer.Comment
-
Yep...Originally posted by DrSpike
Yeah he is a bit of a spammer.
But now... it looks like some teams are in place. Let the match begin. (maybe in our lifetime )
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey, Baron O and SlowwhandComment
-
Would it be possible for a non-playing third party to host?Comment
-
Yeah... it's possible. The seventh non team civ would be the host.Originally posted by DrSpike
Would it be possible for a non-playing third party to host?
His original settler(s) would be off limits to the other players. To keep him interested, the teams would have to give him their maps on a regular basis... He could also act as the ref
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey, Baron O and SlowwhandComment
-
If you make it a seven player game. And the impartial 7th player hosts and just keeps a settler, it may work. If one of the civs gives him a defensive unit or two and they just fortify on a mountain so barbs can't kill him, he should be able to survive in the game. Later someone can give him construction for building a fortress.
Damn you Ming, a minute faster. I should type faster.
It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
It is kinda impractical perhaps, but I thought it might be a good way to settle any _cough_ minor disputes that could arise. It would also help when both sides claim victory.
I expect the point is a moot one anyways.Comment
-
But it would be funny to hear Markus (or substitute any of the others) boasting about how he beat the ref. His trade was cooking and he was getting techs every turn, and the ref only had construction.
RAH
Sorry, couldn't resist.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
I am sure any hypothetical game will be played in good spirit with the winners and losers both doing so gracefully.
Comment
-
No need to protect the settler, we don't play barbs.Comment
Comment