Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

RAH rules V: Attack of the Ferrets

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    What about dry dock?

    Bringing ships at every point you want: sometimes you need lots of battleships on a lake and there is no land tightness narrowly enough for a Panama-City. Just found a city at the seacoast. Bring in the ships, dissolve the city (ships stay on land) move settler one field away, found new city, bring in ships, dissolve...and so on.
    Nothing is more painful than regret.
    Don't contradict a woman - wait until she does herself

    Comment


    • #32
      I have no problem with that. How about the rest of you? Expensive way to move ships and a bummer if you lose a stack . Fewer opportunities to need that type of thing on our small rock worlds.
      It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
      RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

      Comment


      • #33
        I remember when the "dry dock trick" first came up, people considered it a big cheat. But I see your point.
        Keep on Civin'
        RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

        Comment


        • #34
          if your going to spend the resources to do that in our worlds.....all the power to you.....

          i certainly won't........
          Boston Red Sox are 2004 World Series Champions!

          Comment


          • #35
            Battleships in Oklahoma?

            Oh yeah, that's consistent with game logic.
            Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
            RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms

            Comment


            • #36
              As consistent as bribing a city for 23 gold
              Keep on Civin'
              RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

              Comment


              • #37
                But we don't allow city bribing.

                It would be good for a sneak attack on an inland lake. But dangerous setting up. If you're spotted, it could get dicey.
                It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                Comment


                • #38
                  Yeah... ships caught in port... and a size one city could be nasty

                  Did anybody ever remember that rule we discussed over the weekend of the lost?
                  Keep on Civin'
                  RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    oops, forgot to include the warrior gunpowder thingy. I'll try to add it in tomorrow (if 'poly is still fast)
                    Pool Manager - Lombardi Handicappers League - An NFL Pick 'Em Pool

                    https://youtu.be/HLNhPMQnWu4

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Yeah... add it when you can... late night and early morning are the best times these days.
                      Keep on Civin'
                      RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Battleships on an mountain fortress with no city nearby would be interesting to see.
                        Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                        "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                        2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          If you're playing the AI, it would be a cruise missle bait area. Do Battleships get the terrain modification defense bonus or the fortress modifier for that matter?
                          It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                          RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Rah in another thread: The other day I started on the 0 coordinate on a river. I was able to start two cities on the river that both could use the same whale. Sweet.

                            A rarity sure, but it happens............is Rah clever for exploiting it? Or is he doomed to be eaten alive by his own ferrets for his cynical exploitation?

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              That has never been discussed here, but I doubt anyone has an objection to using that exploit. You are right, it is a rare occurence. If anyone does, please post it here.
                              It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                              RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                On second thought, you really can't outlaw it since whenever your city grew, it would automatically use the whale. That would make it a bit too tedious, having to remember to take it off every time, and if you missed it once, you wouldn't want to be accused of cheating.
                                It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                                RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X