Demo Game #3 - Restrictions

[cavebear]

About 18 hours left in this poll. Speak your mind or your opinions will not be included...

[mrboo123]

I don't care, expect the maw srocing thing,

[Ben Kenobi]

If there is a demand for a high score game, I'll post my latest save, still in the 1700's with over 200 million people, and you can take a run for the last 250 years.

As for a DG?




I vote for no camels, lots of barbs and lots of cities.

[MrWhereItsAt]

Yeesh, I just made it.

No caravans but yes to Wonders. I have done Trade Supremo before and Caravans seemed to be so unbalancing - I never use them like that in my games.
No to ICS (it's the principle, dammit!) and roving Barbs.

[-Jrabbit]

Well, if we have no WoWs, ICS will simply not be possible.

I like barbs, since they pose far more threat to the AI than to a human.

No WoWs can be fun, but if we're going there, our limited number of cities (due to unhappiness) will need camels.

Actually, I care little for the details. It's just great to know that we can take the gloves off and kick some AI tail.


( * -Jrabbit looking forward to War4ever taking a lead role in CwDG#3 * )

[H Tower]

Never got a chance to vote, but that's ok, looks like a challenging game. No wonders, no caravans, no ICS, raging hordes.

On a mostly land map too IIRC.

[Gramphos]

Originally posted by atawa
Voted no ICS, but how many city's can we build so we're not ICS'ing?

I think it's not the number of cities, but the speed at which the cities are built, and the distance between the cities that tells wether you ICS or not...