Originally posted by Field Marshal Klesh
No, there is no sequence needed. Only that all playing members play their part of the turn.
No, there is no sequence needed. Only that all playing members play their part of the turn.
That seems sequential to me.
35 turns in the game. If people dont want to stick around, that not our problem. We have enough kids from the SLeague, who are genuine scenario designers and enthusiasts to which this idea is like a godsend (the way we always wanted to play this epic game). The rest is speculation. We'll see I guess.
I guess this is a different kind of game then. If its a new idea I created, I didnt give it the right name. Simultanious Multiplayer PBEM? S&M-PBEM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc27f/cc27f75beab4b66d43ac0cfe134297ef7d272527" alt="EEK!"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e405/1e4059b6a1a7224a62732279825c38e7a7043849" alt="naughty"
The default WWII scenario by Microprose would simply not fly with the SLeague (which added to that the PBEMers which are Sleaguers playing) was the target group for my original post. Blame HTower for this one here. Our job over there is to make scenarios. We have so many in the WWII genre, but RF is like the monumental beacon to us all. It's strange, but it has a quality to it that is something special. I really dont think were going to have a problem with it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23c31/23c3109e6bb48eb87fb0ffd7099792f4cdb7724c" alt="thumbs-up"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5bfc/e5bfcedff4f448957d5b81b22679bcd94a3b45ac" alt="Cool"
Comment