War plans Japan 725 BC

[Ben Kenobi]

Kill, pillage,burn

No use for distant cities suffering enormous corruption. Attack, and if the city dies, so be it.

[atawa]

Yes, they will couse more unhappyness then they are worth in trade or production.

[Sparrowhawk]

While having Kyoto wiped off the map would not displease me, I would prefer if we were able to take the city and add it to our growing empire (and use it as a staging area to take whatever Japanese cities remain). As for the corruption and waste, I think that even if the city has high production and waste, as long as it is self sustaining, that it is a good addition to our empire, and will eventually be joined by other cities, bridging the gap.

[Six Thousand Year Old Man]

Originally posted by Sparrowhawk
While having Kyoto wiped off the map would not displease me, I would prefer if we were able to take the city and add it to our growing empire (and use it as a staging area to take whatever Japanese cities remain). As for the corruption and waste, I think that even if the city has high production and waste, as long as it is self sustaining, that it is a good addition to our empire, and will eventually be joined by other cities, bridging the gap.

I tend to agree. We won't be in Monarchy forever - so corruption won't always be (as big) a problem.

Also, IIRC we decided to limit the number of cities we built. Capturing cities is the only way to grow our empire once we hit the city limit.

[Hydey]

The voting is obvious, the attack shall continue.

All power to our Mighty Army.

[-Jrabbit]

Best of luck to General Hydey and his mighty forces.