moving threads question

[Skanky Burns]

Plus changing names. Talk about spam!!



(In no way does this post represent any desire for that particluar thread to stop being updated, however)

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by Spiffor

Well, I only remember Menlas, and it was like 10-30 posts less. I remeber having noticed it with many posters, but I don't recall whom. Skywalker complained he had his postcount reduced (before his PCR), so maybe he knows precisely what happened to him.

I don't remember this when was this?

[alva]

Plus, many of mine are from doing the paperwork in the Ban Log

That system is a corrupt as a cop being paid on commision for writing tickets

[Tuberski]

Originally posted by alva

Plus, many of mine are from doing the paperwork in the Ban Log

That system is a corrupt as a cop being paid on commision for writing tickets

Well Said!!!



ACK!

[Ming]

Hmmm... maybe we should just stop the paperwork, ban whom ever we want... never release them since there is no record that they were even banned...

Hmmm... I'm starting to like the sound of this

[Tuberski]

Originally posted by Ming
Hmmm... maybe we should just stop the paperwork, ban whom ever we want... never release them since there is no record that they were even banned...

Hmmm... I'm starting to like the sound of this

Not that we think you would, but you could spam those forums and us mere mortals would never know!



ACK!

[DrSpike]

Originally posted by Tuberski


Not that we think you would, but you could spam those forums and us mere mortals would never know!



ACK!

Quid custodiet ipsos custodes.

[Skanky Burns]

Heaven forbid that forum becomes a post-count free zone like the OT.

I guess you need some incentive to do the paperwork though, even if it is only to increase the margin between you and the next closest deity.

[mrmitchell]

Quid custodiet ipsos custodes.

Loret ipsum?
---

Displaying Topics 1 to 25 of 4874

On a search of "All Open Forums" for User Name "Ming" and any date. I'm too lazy to figure how many posts/thread he actually does (if that's figurable using the data vBulletin gives you) so I'll let someone else do that

[Dauphin]

Originally posted by Ming

Plus, many of mine are from doing the paperwork in the Ban Log



Hmmm... maybe we should just stop the paperwork, ban whom ever we want... never release them since there is no record that they were even banned...

Or more logically, change it so that banning paperwork doesn't give you a +1.

But then that's about as likely as a politician awarding himself a paycut.

[DrSpike]

I don't think it's worth Ming's while to ban someone to get a +1..........he can do it far easier than that anyway, so I don't think there is much of a conflict of interest.

[Ming]

It's really just a pain in the neck to do the paperwork. But it has to be done so that if somebody whines to the admin, they will be able to see the details behind the ban and can respond properly. For the time and effort it takes to do it, I could just as easily make 10 or so posts in any of the Demo games

And if you really think I would ban somebody just to get a single post, I want some of whatever you are smoking

[Ben Kenobi]

It's not like those moderator muscles are getting flabby from lack of use.

[Hydey]

Ming does not need to spam to help his post count, he just responds to all of our spam to do it.

[DrSpike]

Good point............justifiable meta-spam probably accounts for 2k posts or so.